1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.50767
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and use of a rugged new piezoresistive pressure transducer

Abstract: Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmative actiodequal opportunity empldyer. is operated by the University of California for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract W-7405-ENG-36. By acceptance of this article, the publisher recognizes that the U.S. Government retains a nonexclusive, royalty-free license to publish or reproduce the published form of this contribution, or to allow others to do so. for U.S. Government purposes. The Los Alamos National Laboraton, requests that the publisher identify this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the present, we have no explanation for the delay in the response of the carbon resistor and we can only mention that a similar phenomenon was obtained in earlier research. 24 These experimental data were compared with the results of numerical simulations in which the carbon resistor was considered as a sequence of many resistors R io connected in series, experiencing the simulated pressure P i ðtÞ evolution behind the front of the converging SW (see Fig. 8(b)).…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the present, we have no explanation for the delay in the response of the carbon resistor and we can only mention that a similar phenomenon was obtained in earlier research. 24 These experimental data were compared with the results of numerical simulations in which the carbon resistor was considered as a sequence of many resistors R io connected in series, experiencing the simulated pressure P i ðtÞ evolution behind the front of the converging SW (see Fig. 8(b)).…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%