2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-017-0440-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration, Projection, and Final Image Products of MESSENGER’s Mercury Dual Imaging System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparing our spectra with the end members reported in Figure 8, we suggest that the composition of hollows is due to the presence of a mixture of different minerals (sulfides and silicates with different relative abundances) that may contribute to the absorption found in our spectra. These findings must consider the limitation of the MDIS WAC calibration reported in Denevi et al (2018), suggesting caution in interpreting features in MDIS spectra found in individual WAC data sets. Indeed, temporal variations observed in MDIS responsivity result in the presence of spurious spectral features in WAC color sets.…”
Section: Spectral Matching and Mineralogical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By comparing our spectra with the end members reported in Figure 8, we suggest that the composition of hollows is due to the presence of a mixture of different minerals (sulfides and silicates with different relative abundances) that may contribute to the absorption found in our spectra. These findings must consider the limitation of the MDIS WAC calibration reported in Denevi et al (2018), suggesting caution in interpreting features in MDIS spectra found in individual WAC data sets. Indeed, temporal variations observed in MDIS responsivity result in the presence of spurious spectral features in WAC color sets.…”
Section: Spectral Matching and Mineralogical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…All such evidences suggest that the spectral artifacts are constant within a given multispectral image set. Hence, as reported by Denevi et al (2018), future refinement and improvements to the calibration of the WAC data set must be performed for spectral studies that make use of the individual WAC color sets.…”
Section: Spectral Matching and Mineralogical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we use the final calibration of the Mercury Dual Imaging System 665 m/pixel, eight-color, global image mosaic, described by Denevi et al (2018) and available in the Planetary Data System (PDS) and at http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/Explore/Images.html#global-mosaics. Responsivity of the Mercury Dual Imaging System filters was found to vary in an unpredictable manner over time, possibly due to radiation or outgassing events, resulting in artifacts in previous global mosaic products that led to some regions being omitted from analyses of relative spectral reflectance properties (Murchie et al, 2015) and hampered quantitative comparisons of albedo and reflectance trends on a global scale.…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final image mosaic product has been obtained in June 2018 with the version 3.5.2.0 (6 April 2018) of the Integrated Software for Imagers and Spectrometers developed and provided by the U.S. Geological Survey (Anderson et al, ; Gaddis et al, ; Torson & Becker, ). Our method is mainly based on the method described in Denevi et al (, section 8) to obtain the final products of the MESSENGER team. Below are reminded the main steps of the two methods, and their differences are addressed.…”
Section: Data Set and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%