2008
DOI: 10.1016/s1134-282x(08)72610-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calidad de las variables administrativas del Conjunto Mínimo Básico de Datos de Osakidetza-Servicio Vasco de Salud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies on the validity of MBDS conducted more than 1 decade ago have identified important reliability problems, 22 although more recent study suggests that data quality has improved. 23 However, there is a need for more studies on the validity of specific MBDS codes. 24 In addition, there are two other data sets that can be internally linked with the aforementioned data sets at an individual level: the mortality registry, with information on date and cause of death (since 2016, coded using ICD-10-ES), and the population register, which collects individual demographic and socioeconomic data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies on the validity of MBDS conducted more than 1 decade ago have identified important reliability problems, 22 although more recent study suggests that data quality has improved. 23 However, there is a need for more studies on the validity of specific MBDS codes. 24 In addition, there are two other data sets that can be internally linked with the aforementioned data sets at an individual level: the mortality registry, with information on date and cause of death (since 2016, coded using ICD-10-ES), and the population register, which collects individual demographic and socioeconomic data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, PCCDBs also have limitations in terms of completeness; they tend to be much more heterogeneous than databases and registries designed to collect data on specific pathologies and frequently present under-recording bias. Such information sources are usually fairly accurate regarding administrative data but suffer from significant heterogeneity in terms of quality with respect to the coding of discharge circumstances and comorbidities, among other questions [40,41]. Finally, PCCDBs may provide a useful complement to clinical databases.…”
Section: Pccdb Per Se and The Nihss Scalementioning
confidence: 99%