Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3326365.3326409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Blockchain Leverage for New Public Governance?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… CO-production: At this stage, the community proceeds to finalize conceptual and creative solutions, realizing the “production” of everyday goods and services created as a result of a transparent and participatory process that meets the assumptions of the entire community (cf. Brinkmann and Heine, 2019; McMullin, 2021; Wiesel and Modell, 2014). CO-mmon goods: Due to all the previous stages and cooperation within the community, everyday goods and services are created.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… CO-production: At this stage, the community proceeds to finalize conceptual and creative solutions, realizing the “production” of everyday goods and services created as a result of a transparent and participatory process that meets the assumptions of the entire community (cf. Brinkmann and Heine, 2019; McMullin, 2021; Wiesel and Modell, 2014). CO-mmon goods: Due to all the previous stages and cooperation within the community, everyday goods and services are created.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-creation (4-CO) and co-production (5-CO) are interconnected terms but should not be used interchangeably (Ansell and Torfing, 2021a). These elements of the framework follow directly from definitions proposed by McMullin (2021), Brinkmann and Heine (2019), Wiesel and Modell (2014), as well as Ansell and Torfing (2021b). The concept of co-production in the context of being an NPG-driven tool is also elucidated in detail in the work of Sorrentino et al (2018), who make a distinctive differentiation between "traditional" and "non-traditional" forms of co-production.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regulatory sense-making is the decoding of practices to identify underlying causes for certain practices and the re-coding and comparison with already coded rules which themselves guide the DLT design materialization process (Gherardi, 2012). The DLT maintenance sense-making thus comprises regulatory aspects such as evaluation of the underlying process execution model , analysis of the transaction processing (Paik et al, 2019), assessing the importance and needed adjustment to interoperability needs , and constant assessment of the requirements of security requests and if they are fulfilled (Reed et al, 2018;Brinkmann and Heine, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brinkmann and Heine (2019) in “Can blockchain leverage for new public governance? A conceptual analysis on process level” presented the preliminary results of ongoing research, which aimed to shed light on the more concrete benefits of blockchain for New Public Governance.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Methodology and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%