2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Estimated Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time Be Used Interchangeably With Stopwatch-measured Intravaginal Ejaculatory Latency Time for the Diagnosis of Lifelong Premature Ejaculation?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, eIELT was not significantly different between" CGIC = 0″ and" CGIC≥1″ groups, suggesting that eIELT might be poorly estimated in the real-world setting. Lee et al [7] compared stopwatch-determined IELT and eIELT in healthy men and found that eIELT was overestimated by approximately 1 min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, eIELT was not significantly different between" CGIC = 0″ and" CGIC≥1″ groups, suggesting that eIELT might be poorly estimated in the real-world setting. Lee et al [7] compared stopwatch-determined IELT and eIELT in healthy men and found that eIELT was overestimated by approximately 1 min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, stopwatch-determined intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) is the most common measure to diagnose and evaluate treatment efficacy in clinical trials, which is not appropriate in real world practice. In the clinical setting, stopwatch-determined IELT is substituted by selfestimated IELT, which is often overestimated by patients [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…vaginal or anal penetration)’. Estimated ejaculation latencies have been used previously as a fairly reliable indicator of stopwatch‐measured latencies (Lee et al., 2015; Rosen et al., 2007). Using similar phraseology, men were also asked to estimate TYPICAL and IDEAL ELTs for men (in general) during partnered sex, as well as a threshold ELT characteristic of men with PE (PE ELT).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, the nomogram was not externally validated using independent cohorts from other institutions, which may limit the broad application of the nomogram. Fifth, the IELT used in our study was self-reported IELT, which may be overestimated 33 and susceptible to subjectivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%