2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00775-018-1540-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can nitrocobalamin be reduced by ascorbic acid to nitroxylcobalamin? Some surprising mechanistic findings

Abstract: Despite detailed studies on nitroxylcobalamin (CblNO) formation, the possible intracellular generation of CblNO via reduction of nitrocobalamin (CblNO2) remains questionable. To study this further, spectroscopic studies on the reaction of CblNO2 with the intracellular antioxidant ascorbic acid (HAsc−) were performed in aqueous solution at pH < 5.0. It was found that nitroxylcobalamin is the final product of this interaction, which is not just a simple reaction but a rather complex chemical process. We clearly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CblNO 2 (λ max = 354, 413 and 532 nm) [11,12] is converted to CblNO (λ max = 316, 344 and 475 nm) [7] with isosbestic points at 335, 373 and 490 nm. [10] A plot of absorbance at 532 nm versus time is shown in Figure 1b; the data fitted well to a first-order rate equation with an observed rate constant of k obs = (5.8 � 0.1) × 10 À 4 s À 1 at 25.0°C, following an initial zero-order rate process as observed before. [10,11] In order to investigate the role of inorganic compounds present in PM on the reaction described above, selected nanoparticles of redox-active metal oxides (Fe 2 O 3 , Fe 3 O 4 with and without stabilizer, CuO and Mn 3 O 4 ) and non-redox-active metal oxides (SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 ) were added to the reaction mixture, shortly before the initiation of the reaction between CblNO 2 and Asc (see Experimental Section).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…CblNO 2 (λ max = 354, 413 and 532 nm) [11,12] is converted to CblNO (λ max = 316, 344 and 475 nm) [7] with isosbestic points at 335, 373 and 490 nm. [10] A plot of absorbance at 532 nm versus time is shown in Figure 1b; the data fitted well to a first-order rate equation with an observed rate constant of k obs = (5.8 � 0.1) × 10 À 4 s À 1 at 25.0°C, following an initial zero-order rate process as observed before. [10,11] In order to investigate the role of inorganic compounds present in PM on the reaction described above, selected nanoparticles of redox-active metal oxides (Fe 2 O 3 , Fe 3 O 4 with and without stabilizer, CuO and Mn 3 O 4 ) and non-redox-active metal oxides (SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 ) were added to the reaction mixture, shortly before the initiation of the reaction between CblNO 2 and Asc (see Experimental Section).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…[10] A plot of absorbance at 532 nm versus time is shown in Figure 1b; the data fitted well to a first-order rate equation with an observed rate constant of k obs = (5.8 � 0.1) × 10 À 4 s À 1 at 25.0°C, following an initial zero-order rate process as observed before. [10,11] In order to investigate the role of inorganic compounds present in PM on the reaction described above, selected nanoparticles of redox-active metal oxides (Fe 2 O 3 , Fe 3 O 4 with and without stabilizer, CuO and Mn 3 O 4 ) and non-redox-active metal oxides (SiO 2 and Al 2 O 3 ) were added to the reaction mixture, shortly before the initiation of the reaction between CblNO 2 and Asc (see Experimental Section). The reactions were monitored by recording UV-Vis spectra, which clearly demonstrated that the addition of nanoparticles do not affect the formation of the final reaction product, i. e. CblNO 2 was still converted to CblNO with isosbestic points at 335, 373 and 490 nm.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We received the following comment from a reader of JBIC concerning an apparent error made in two recent papers published by our group in JBIC [ 1 , 2 ]: ‘The authors use the term nitroxyl to describe the coordination of NO to the cobalt of cobalamin. This term is not correct nomenclature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%