2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can policy implementation increase public waste sorting behavior? The comparison between regions with and without waste sorting policy implementation in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
17
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, 97% and 91% of the respondents hold that convenient waste segregation facilities and humanized segregation reward and punishment mechanism would promote their waste segregation (Figure 1(c)). It suggests that the lack of waste segregation knowledge is not a difficulty for students to sort waste, which is contrary to the results of study on waste segregation behaviour in general residential community (Tian et al, 2022) because general residents usually lacked education in waste segregation (Liu et al, 2019;Pan et al, 2022).…”
Section: Policies/rules Related To Dsw Segregationcontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…In addition, 97% and 91% of the respondents hold that convenient waste segregation facilities and humanized segregation reward and punishment mechanism would promote their waste segregation (Figure 1(c)). It suggests that the lack of waste segregation knowledge is not a difficulty for students to sort waste, which is contrary to the results of study on waste segregation behaviour in general residential community (Tian et al, 2022) because general residents usually lacked education in waste segregation (Liu et al, 2019;Pan et al, 2022).…”
Section: Policies/rules Related To Dsw Segregationcontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…In accordance with previous research, more than 50 percent of people in China are willing to support the government's recycling program; however, waste sorting remains inefficient due to a lack of information on waste classification [9]. Another reason for residents' non-participation in the recycling program may be the establishment of inflexible policies that fail to take the different levels of economic development and population development in different regions into account [10]. In Chinese cities, 3.3-5.6 million people (0.56-0.93% of the urban population) produce waste as a result of their participation in the informal sector [11].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Xie and Lu (2022) advocate that the government of China and environmental NGO's spread environmental knowledge. Knowledge and ideas of pro‐environmental behavior spread among the population (Tian et al, 2022; Xie & Lu, 2022). When friends and relatives are around individuals who have formed social norms, individuals can shorten the time of acquiring environmental knowledge.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%