2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can ratoon cropping improve resource use efficiencies and profitability of rice in central China?

Abstract: Highlights We collected farmer data from middle (MR), double (DR), and ratoon rice (RR) in China. We assessed energy balance, carbon footprint, and economic benefit of MR, DR, and RR. RR achieved higher annual grain yield, net energy yield, and net economic return than MR. RR is an environment-friendly and economically viable alternative for both MR and DR.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
69
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ratooning rice is an economical alternative to the second seasonal rice in subtropical and temperate zones, where the light and temperature are not enough for double cropping cultivation [41]. Compared to the second seasonal rice cultivation, ratooning rice may significantly decrease the production costs by reducing the input of labor force, fertilizer, pesticides and herbicides [42]. Furthermore, ratooning rice results in better grain quality and less field pollution [42, 43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ratooning rice is an economical alternative to the second seasonal rice in subtropical and temperate zones, where the light and temperature are not enough for double cropping cultivation [41]. Compared to the second seasonal rice cultivation, ratooning rice may significantly decrease the production costs by reducing the input of labor force, fertilizer, pesticides and herbicides [42]. Furthermore, ratooning rice results in better grain quality and less field pollution [42, 43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the second seasonal rice cultivation, ratooning rice may significantly decrease the production costs by reducing the input of labor force, fertilizer, pesticides and herbicides [42]. Furthermore, ratooning rice results in better grain quality and less field pollution [42, 43]. Thus the research of ratooning rice is of great significance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the total amount of GHG emissions in relation to CO2-eq was calculated from CO2, N2O, and CH4 released directly and indirectly during rice production. There are three major sources of GHG emissions in rice production: (i) GHGs emissions from production, packaging, and transportation of agricultural inputs, (ii) N2O emissions due to nitrogen (N) application, and (iii) CH4 emission from rice paddy field (Yuan et al 2019). The GHGs emissions from each of agricultural inputs and direct and indirect N2O emissions due to nitrogen fertilizer application were estimated using emission factors given in Table S2.…”
Section: Environmental Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intensive energy input in forms of irrigation water, fertilizer, machinery, diesel oil, and pesticides have dramatically increased GHG emissions (Yuan et al 2019), which in turn threaten the sustainability of agriculture by contributing to global warming (Maraseni et al 2015;Chen 2016). Therefore, reducing energy expenditure and enhancing energy use efficiency (EUE) are crucial to increasing production and minimizing environmental impact (Mohammadi et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, intensive cropping systems result in adverse impacts on the environment [4] as well as in higher production costs. During recent decades, double-season rice systems in central China have progressively shifted into single-season rice mainly due to high costs and an increase in labor shortages [5]. Hence, there is the other rice systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%