Can scenario-planning support community-based natural resource management? Experiences from three countries in Latin America

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) is a concept critical to managing social-ecological systems but whose implementation needs strengthening. Scenario planning is one approach that may offer benefits relevant to CBNRM but whose potential is not yet well understood. Therefore, we designed, trialed, and evaluated a scenario-planning method intended to support CBNRM in three cases, located in Colombia, Mexico, and Argentina. Implementing scenario planning was judged as worthwhile in all three cases, although aspects of it were challenging to facilitate. The benefits generated were relevant to strengthening CBNRM: encouraging the participation of local people and using their knowledge, enhanced consideration of and adaptation to future change, and supporting the development of systems thinking. Tracing exactly when and how these benefits arose was challenging, but two elements of the method seemed particularly useful. First, using a systematic approach to discuss how drivers of change may affect local social-ecological systems helped to foster systems thinking and identify connections between issues. Second, explicitly focusing on how to use and respond to scenarios helped identify specific practical activities, or "response options," that would support CBNRM despite the pressures of future change. Discussions about response options also highlighted the need for support by other actors, e.g., policy groups: this raised the question of when and how other actors and other sources of knowledge should be involved in scenario planning, so as to encourage their buy-in to actions identified by the process. We suggest that other CBNRM initiatives may benefit from adapting and applying scenario planning. However, these initiatives should be carefully monitored because further research is required to understand how and when scenario-planning methods may produce benefits, as well as their strengths and weaknesses versus other methods.

Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research: insights and experiences from 23 case studies

“…PSP can provide a platform that supports stakeholders from different knowledge-systems by enabling communication and interaction to coproduce synthetic social-ecological knowledge as well as codesign new environmental management strategies (Martín-López and Montes 2015). The new Intergovernmental Platform of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) plans to bring together different knowledge systems in its global and regional assessments to coproduce knowledge and design management strategies to face the challenge of biodiversity and ecosystem services conservation (Tengö et al 2014, Díaz et al 2015. A participatory and interdisciplinary research process such as PSP can be seen as a parallel research process, helpful to complement and strengthen existing research based on nonparticipatory methods (Peterson et al 2003a).…”

How can integrated valuation of ecosystem services help understanding and steering agroecological transitions?

“…Ecosystem services make explicit "the benefits people obtain from ecosystems" (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) 2005). They are defined as "the direct and indirect contributions of nature to human wellbeing" (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) 2010) and stress human dependency on natural processes (Díaz et al 2015). Thus, the concept of ES directs attention to interactions and interdependencies of nature, society, and economy.…”

Adapting prospective structural analysis to strengthen sustainable management and capacity building in community-based natural resource management contexts

“…Stakeholders can identify the management plan that best fits their vision for the sustainability of the system. Furthermore, the process can be complemented by other methods, such as scenario building (see Waylen et al 2015).…”