2015
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2015.58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can targeted genetic testing offer useful health information to adoptees?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The restrictive view of genetic testing in adoption has been put forward by several authors (Morris et al 1988 ; Newson and Leonard 2010 ) and challenged by others, who see that the interests of a child may indeed be bound up in the outcome of a decision about adoption (Jansen and Ross 2001 ). It has also been argued that genetic testing, even a genome sequence, may be appropriate in children being considered for adoption because the family history information available to the prospective adopters is often poor and the genome sequence will compensate for this (May et al 2015 ). Counter arguments to this last claim are numerous and persuasive, for the present, as the interpretation of a genome sequence is still far from straightforward and the introduction of yet more genomic uncertainty into the portfolio of information about the child is unlikely to help the prospects of her or him being adopted.…”
Section: Genetic Testing Of (Young) Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The restrictive view of genetic testing in adoption has been put forward by several authors (Morris et al 1988 ; Newson and Leonard 2010 ) and challenged by others, who see that the interests of a child may indeed be bound up in the outcome of a decision about adoption (Jansen and Ross 2001 ). It has also been argued that genetic testing, even a genome sequence, may be appropriate in children being considered for adoption because the family history information available to the prospective adopters is often poor and the genome sequence will compensate for this (May et al 2015 ). Counter arguments to this last claim are numerous and persuasive, for the present, as the interpretation of a genome sequence is still far from straightforward and the introduction of yet more genomic uncertainty into the portfolio of information about the child is unlikely to help the prospects of her or him being adopted.…”
Section: Genetic Testing Of (Young) Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because adoptees may differ from the general population in their responses to PGT, there is a need for empirical study of how adoptees perceive and utilize PGT results. 10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for those who lack FHx, a very different evaluative framework will apply (May et al , 2015). For these individuals, we must consider the likelihood that early identification of disease could be arrived at in another way, absent the use of traditional FHx.…”
Section: Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, for those adoptees who do have access to FHx, this is often inadequate, and seldom iterative, calling into question its clinical value (Classen et al , 2010). Elsewhere, we have argued that targeted genetic testing has the potential for mitigating the deleterious impact of adoptees’ access to adequate FHx (May et al , 2015). Here, we explore the potential economic implications of such testing in this context (Quinn and Vadaparampil, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%