2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(03)00191-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the reproducibility of fetal heart rate baseline estimation be improved?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is an urgent need to develop noninvasive methods that provide complementary information on fetal well-being and that can be used ante-and intrapartum. Indeed, there are substantial variations in the interpretation FHR patterns [4][5][6][7] . In our study, we observed a discordance of 41.6% in interpretation using the NCHID classification method, and similar results can be found in the literature [8][9][10] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is an urgent need to develop noninvasive methods that provide complementary information on fetal well-being and that can be used ante-and intrapartum. Indeed, there are substantial variations in the interpretation FHR patterns [4][5][6][7] . In our study, we observed a discordance of 41.6% in interpretation using the NCHID classification method, and similar results can be found in the literature [8][9][10] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, FHR monitoring has some limitations. One of its main disadvantages is the substantial variations that can occur in the interpretation of FHR patterns [4][5][6][7] , even when using standardized classification methods (3-or 5-tier approaches, used according to the risk of fetal acidosis) [8][9][10] . The second concern is the low level of efficacy in the use of FHR-pattern analysis to predict neonatal outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual analysis of FHR tracings has been demonstrated to suffer from significant intra and interobserver disagreement, both in identification of basic FHR features (accelerations, decelerations and variability) [6] and in overall classification of tracings [7]. Appropriate training and use of consensus guidelines do not appear to solve this problem, although some improvements can be achieved in baseline estimation [24]. Computerized analysis remains the best alternative to obtain a completely reproducible and quantitative analysis of FHR tracings.…”
Section: Foetal Heart Rate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FHR baseline, as the mean FHR in the absence of fetal activity and uterine contractions, conveys information especially about the intrinsic activity of the heart [12,30,31]. Short and longterm variability reflect the interaction between sympathetic and parasympathetic systems, expressing the influence of external and internal stimuli that can affect the fetus, namely from its central nervous system [24,28,29].…”
Section: Significance and Computation Of Entropy And Frequency Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%