2019
DOI: 10.1002/nau.24260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can we improve our diagnosis of impaired detrusor contractility in women? An ICI‐RS 2019 proposal

Abstract: Introduction Widely accepted consensus terminology and calculations of detrusor contractility in females do not exist but may be useful. We report the output of a proposal session at the International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society meeting 2019, addressing the title topic. Methods Three formal presentations and a lively discussion addressed several questions including: which is the optimal cutoff value of female bladder voiding efficiency during uroflow to suspect obstruction or detrusor underac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prediction of the ability to void after interventions affecting bladder outlet anatomy is a relevant aim of the quantification of DVC. To diagnose and evaluate management of DUVC e.g., of female patients with clinical signs and an underactive bladder syndrome, quantification of DVC is also relevant 81 . The WG speculates that it is not impossible that these two aims require different parameters for DVC in women (and men after radical prostatectomy).…”
Section: Ics‐clinical Standard Pfs Analysis In Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Prediction of the ability to void after interventions affecting bladder outlet anatomy is a relevant aim of the quantification of DVC. To diagnose and evaluate management of DUVC e.g., of female patients with clinical signs and an underactive bladder syndrome, quantification of DVC is also relevant 81 . The WG speculates that it is not impossible that these two aims require different parameters for DVC in women (and men after radical prostatectomy).…”
Section: Ics‐clinical Standard Pfs Analysis In Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To diagnose and evaluate management of DUVC e.g., of female patients with clinical signs and an underactive bladder syndrome, quantification of DVC is also relevant. 81 The WG speculates that it is not impossible that these two aims require different parameters for DVC in women (and men after radical prostatectomy). Furthermore, the WG contemplates on theoretical grounds [16][17][18] that WF (max) and PIP1 may (further) demonstrate clinical relevance in women but, potentially better for management of DUVC than for predication of the ability to void after surgery 78,82 but considers that at present evidence is insufficient to include WF in the standard, for women.…”
Section: Reporting Dvc In Womenmentioning
confidence: 99%