2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can we predict urinary stress incontinence by using demographic, clinical, imaging and urodynamic data?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrasound allows visualizing implants used in urogynecological patients, that is why pelvic floor ultrasound is now an imaging of choice in evaluating patients after mesh implantation [6,7]. It is also often used to evaluate women with stress urinary incontinence before and after suburethral sling implantation [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ultrasound allows visualizing implants used in urogynecological patients, that is why pelvic floor ultrasound is now an imaging of choice in evaluating patients after mesh implantation [6,7]. It is also often used to evaluate women with stress urinary incontinence before and after suburethral sling implantation [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also often used to evaluate women with stress urinary incontinence before and after suburethral sling implantation [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several sonographic approaches have been used for the study of urogynecologic symptoms: suprapubic, translabial, transvaginal, transperineal, introital, 2D, 3D and 4D [1,13,19]. There is no consensus on optimal approach to be used for different situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements of small pelvis structures with USG showed good reproducibility [11][12][13][14]. Dietz et al showed that the ultrasound perineal evaluation of bladder neck mobility performed with a transabdominal probe has a good reproducibility, even if repeated 32-122 days after the first test [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation