2019
DOI: 10.1002/pon.5282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer patients' expectations when undergoing extensive molecular diagnostics—A qualitative study

Abstract: Objective: Precision cancer medicine (PCM) aims at identifying tumor-driving molecular characteristics to improve therapy. Despite early successes for some cancers, the approach faces manifold challenges. Patients undergoing extensive molecular diagnostics (MD) may hope for personal benefit, although chances are small. In order to offer suitable support to this group, health-care professionals need to gain insight into patients' experience. Thus, this study sought to explore the expectations of cancer patients… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the only study that focused on the attitudes and expectations of patients with advanced cancer who had undergone tumor multigene NGS but had not yet received results (Table 3), many patients reported realistic hope for better "individualized" treatment or contribution to research, but some expressed an unrealistic hope for cure [22].…”
Section: Attitudes Expectations and Concerns About The Primary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the only study that focused on the attitudes and expectations of patients with advanced cancer who had undergone tumor multigene NGS but had not yet received results (Table 3), many patients reported realistic hope for better "individualized" treatment or contribution to research, but some expressed an unrealistic hope for cure [22].…”
Section: Attitudes Expectations and Concerns About The Primary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were screened for distress using a self-assessment questionnaire. This data has been reported earlier [12] and is not included in the present qualitative evaluation. Furthermore, study assistants explored aspects of information and expectations by means of a semi-structured interview guide (supplementary file 1).…”
Section: Study Procedures and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…According to experts' ratings, programs were highly comparable. For a detailed description of study methods, see also Rohrmoser et al [12].…”
Section: Participants and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations