1984
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.29.2199
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canonical quantization of supergravity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
228
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
228
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, in supergravity the Bianchi class A models seem to have the same kind of state as was pointed out by D'Eath, Hawking and Obregón [6] and for the Bianchi IX case D'Eath [7] proved that only the term exp(−I) is permitted in the wave funtion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, in supergravity the Bianchi class A models seem to have the same kind of state as was pointed out by D'Eath, Hawking and Obregón [6] and for the Bianchi IX case D'Eath [7] proved that only the term exp(−I) is permitted in the wave funtion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Graham found, as Ryan and Moncrief proved and is also connected to the state obtained by means of supergravity [6,7]. This state could be understood as the wormhole quantum state [7,9,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study of N = 1 supergravity models has been limited so far to minisuperspace models [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12] as direct generalizations of quantum cosmology models. The standard approach to quantum cosmology consists in canonically quantizing a minisuperspace model which is obtained by imposing certain symmetry conditions on the metrics allowed on the spacelike slices of the universe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we have a canonical formulation of N=1 supergravity which constitutes a (Dirac) like square root of gravity [3,4,5]. Quantum wormhole and Hartle-Hawking solutions were found in minisuperspaces for pure N=1 supergravity [8,[11][12][13][14][15]18,19,36,37,39] but the former state is absent in the literature 2 , for pure gravity cases [1,9,16,[28][29][30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%