2018
DOI: 10.54302/mausam.v69i2.355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canopy temperature as indicator of thermal and nutrient stresses in wheat crop

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficient of determination explained 86.7% and 73.5%; 85.8% and 65.8%; 79.8% and 67.3% variability in cowpea pod yield due to canopy temperature which was affected by crop geometry and nutrient management at 30 DAS, 50 DAS and harvest of crop, respectively. These findings confirm with the findings of Marois et al (2004); Carroll et al (2017); Kaur et al (2018). Regression studies between PAR and cowpea pod yield was depicted in Fig 2 . Here, intercepted PAR was positively correlated with pod yield of cowpea and R 2 value from 0.6596 to 0.7087 was increasing with advancement of crop growth stage.…”
Section: Regression Studiessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The coefficient of determination explained 86.7% and 73.5%; 85.8% and 65.8%; 79.8% and 67.3% variability in cowpea pod yield due to canopy temperature which was affected by crop geometry and nutrient management at 30 DAS, 50 DAS and harvest of crop, respectively. These findings confirm with the findings of Marois et al (2004); Carroll et al (2017); Kaur et al (2018). Regression studies between PAR and cowpea pod yield was depicted in Fig 2 . Here, intercepted PAR was positively correlated with pod yield of cowpea and R 2 value from 0.6596 to 0.7087 was increasing with advancement of crop growth stage.…”
Section: Regression Studiessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…CT at the heading stage (CT HS ) was low in heat-tolerant genotypes as compared to heat-sensitive genotypes. Low CT was significantly associated with grain yield in a number of studies ( Guo et al., 2016 ; Kaur et al., 2018 ; Liang et al., 2018 ; Sohail et al., 2020 ). In previous studies, CT was established as a selection criterion as it showed a high correlation with delay in the senescence of leaves ( Fang et al., 2017 ), stomatal conductance ( Bonari et al., 2020 ), leaf and stem wax ( Mondal et al., 2015 ), root system architecture ( Pinto and Reynolds, 2015 ), grain/spike ( Sohail et al., 2020 ), and 1000 grain weight ( Gulnaz et al., 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…CT at the heading stage (CT HS ) was low in heat-tolerant genotypes as compared to heat-sensitive genotypes. Low CT was significantly associated with grain yield in a number of studies (Guo et al, 2016;Kaur et al, 2018;Sohail et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%