Capacity changes in German certified chest pain units during COVID-19 outbreak response

Abstract

Background We sought to determine structure and changes in organisation and bed capacities of certified German chest pain units (CPU) in response to the emergency plan setup as a response to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods and results The study was conducted in the form of a standardised telephone interview survey in certified German CPUs. Analyses comprised the overall setting of the CPU, bed capacities, possibilities for ventilation, possible changes in organisation and resources, chest pain patient admittance, overall availability of CPUs and bail-out strategies. The response rate was 91%. Nationwide, CPU bed capacities decreased by 3% in the early phase of COVID-19 pandemic response, exhibiting differences within and between the federal states. Pre-pandemic and pandemic bed capacities stayed below 1 CPU bed per 50,000 inhabitants. 97% of CPUs were affected by internal reorganisation pandemic plans at variable extent. While we observed a decrease of CPU beds within an emergency room (ER) setup and on intermediate care units (ICU), beds in units being separated from ER and ICU were even increased in numbers. Conclusions Certified German CPUs are able to maintain adequate coverage for chest pain patients in COVID-19 pandemic despite structural changes. However, at this time, it appears important to add operating procedures during pandemic outbreaks to the certification criteria of forthcoming guidelines either at the individual CPU level or more centrally steered by the German Cardiac Society or the European Society of Cardiology.

COVID-19 among heart transplant recipients in Germany: a multicenter survey

“…Thus, our data may be incomplete and may underestimate the prevalence of COVID-19 among heart transplant recipients. Of note, we found only 3 patients from northern and eastern Germany and 18 from southern and western Germany, reflecting the inhomogeneous distribution of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Germany [36,37].…”

Performing elective cardiac invasive procedures during the COVID-19 outbreak: a position statement from the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

“…Healthcare systems were re-organised to separate as much as possible "hot" (dedicated to positive or suspected COVID-19 patients) from "cold" pathways (COVID-19 negative). In some regions, this occurred at the hospital level, with fully dedicated COVID-19 hospitals, while in others the separation was done within the same hospital, with COVID-19 dedicated wards and catheterisation laboratories 3 . In this latter case, the access and in-hospital path of the COVID-19 patients was, in general, physically separated from the path of the other patients.…”

Temporal trends in the presentation of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: an analysis of health insurance claims

“…While an association between acute viral respiratory disease and subsequent cardiovascular events had been described for other diseases (e.g., influenza) [5,6], several centers reported a decline in hospital admissions for acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular emergencies during the COVID pandemic [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Since acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases remain leading causes for morbidity and mortality, further investigation of this concerning trend is warranted to identify potential implications for both health-care professionals and regulators.…”