We re-examine, from a political economy perspective, the standard view that higher capital mobility results in lower capital taxes -a view, in fact, that is not confirmed by the available empirical evidence. We show that when a small economy is opened to capital mobility, the change of incidence of a tax on capital -from capital owners to owners of the immobile factor -may interact in such a way with political decision-making so as to cause a rise in the equilibrium tax. This can happen whether or not the fixed factor (labour) can be taxed. * We would like to thank David de Meza, Gareth Myles and seminar participants at CORE, Bristol, Warwick, Exeter and CRETE-2003 for comments. The usual disclaimer applies.