2006
DOI: 10.1157/13091371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Características estructurales de los senos de Valsalva y porción proximal de las arterias coronarias. Su relevancia durante la disección retrógrada aortocoronaria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean of RCA ostium diameter in the present study was 3.43±0.63 in male, 3.34±0.59 in female and 3.4±0.61 mm in all cadaveric hearts and that of LCA was 4.46±0.68 in male, 4.38±0.74 in female, and 4.43±0.69 mm in all cadaveric hearts with no sex difference but there was a significant difference ( P <0.001) between the ostial diameter of RCA compared to that of LCA. In consistence with the results of this study, the mean of the internal diameter of RCA ostia varied from 3.17 mm to 3.9 mm and that of LCA measured from 4.1 mm to 4.96 mm in different researchers [ 3 8 13 16 17 19 ]. However, in contrary to the findings of this investigation, the mean of RCA ostia diameter was 2.5±1.0 mm and 2.38±1.33 mm and that of LCA ostia was 2.8±1.0 and 3.17±0.39 mm, respectively [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mean of RCA ostium diameter in the present study was 3.43±0.63 in male, 3.34±0.59 in female and 3.4±0.61 mm in all cadaveric hearts and that of LCA was 4.46±0.68 in male, 4.38±0.74 in female, and 4.43±0.69 mm in all cadaveric hearts with no sex difference but there was a significant difference ( P <0.001) between the ostial diameter of RCA compared to that of LCA. In consistence with the results of this study, the mean of the internal diameter of RCA ostia varied from 3.17 mm to 3.9 mm and that of LCA measured from 4.1 mm to 4.96 mm in different researchers [ 3 8 13 16 17 19 ]. However, in contrary to the findings of this investigation, the mean of RCA ostia diameter was 2.5±1.0 mm and 2.38±1.33 mm and that of LCA ostia was 2.8±1.0 and 3.17±0.39 mm, respectively [ 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In this study, the site of the coronary ostia was observed below STJ in 80% of RCA, in 73.3% of LCA and in 85.7% of TCA with no significant sex difference. Similarly, a higher incidence of coronary ostia below STJ was recorded than that at or above STJ levels; in 90% of RCA and 73.3% of LCA ostia [ 10 ]; in 65% of RCA and 52.5% of LCA [ 13 ]; in 78% of RCA and 68% of LCA ostia [ 8 ]; in 63% of RCA and 44% of LCA [ 15 ]; in 73.3% for all [ 9 ]; in 78% of RCA and 58% of LCA [ 16 ]; in 90% of RCA and 80% of LCA ostia [ 2 ]; in 75% of RCA and 85% of LCA [ 17 ]; in 60% of RCA and 42% of LCA [ 3 ]; and below STJ in 89.5% of RCA and 80% of LCA and in 6.7% of RCA and 15.2% of LCA at the level of STJ and in 3.8% of RCA and 4.8% of LCA above STJ [ 2 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also found that larger atheromas had a thicker intima. Moreno et al (2002) and López-Mínguez et al (2006) mention that atherosclerotic plaque frequently forms in the most proximal segments and that changes such as rupture of the internal elastic membrane and atrophy of the tunica media with a decrease in thickness and the amount of elastic fibers, occur in the wall. These changes coincide with what we found during microscopic analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goldstein et al (5) reported that 89% of ACD is on the right side and 11% on the left side. López Mínguez et al (6) reported that most cases of ACD are in the RCA, because the RCA has fewer smooth muscle cells and matrix type-1 collagen fibrils than the left coronary artery sinotubular junction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%