1967
DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1967.10469068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Carbon Monoxide and Sulfur Dioxide Adsorption on— and Desorption from Glass, Plastic, and Metal Tubings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polyethylene and tygon cannot be recommended unless long transient periods can be tolerated. Wohlers, et al, 1 suggest an estimated conditioningtime of 15 hr at 0.2 ppm for tygon. Copper, obviously, would not be considered in any case.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Polyethylene and tygon cannot be recommended unless long transient periods can be tolerated. Wohlers, et al, 1 suggest an estimated conditioningtime of 15 hr at 0.2 ppm for tygon. Copper, obviously, would not be considered in any case.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wohlers, et al 1 , give a brief review of the literature. Sufficient evidence has been reported to indicate that losses of sulfur dioxide do occur when the gas contacts materials ranging from plastic bags, to tygon and rubber tubing, to stainless steel cylinders.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the former case, it has been found that tubing made from various materials, as well as filters and filter holders which may be included in the sample line, can absorb appreciable amounts of SO2 on being exposed to sudden increases in concentration. 5 " 8 The effect seems to be humidity dependent, and is more severe at higher humidities, where the SO2 is possibly retained in a water film which forms on the surface of the sample line. Therefore, the SO2 analyzer system response characteristics are also expected to depend on the humidity of the air sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%