Caribou Distribution During the Post-calving Period in Relation to Infrastructure in the Prudhoe Bay Oil Field, Alaska

Abstract

There is concern that caribou (Rangifer tarandus) may avoid roads and facilities (i.e., infrastructure) in the Prudhoe Bay oil field (PBOF) in northern Alaska, and that this avoidance can have negative effects on the animals. We quantified the relationship between caribou distribution and PBOF infrastructure during the post-calving period (mid-June to mid-August) with aerial surveys from 1990 to 1995. We conducted four to eight surveys per year with complete coverage of the PBOF. We identified active oil field infrastructure and used a geographic information system (GIS) to construct ten 1 km wide concentric intervals surrounding the infrastructure. We tested whether caribou distribution is related to distance from infrastructure with a chi-squared habitat utilization-availability analysis and log-linear regression. We considered bulls, calves, and total caribou of all sex/age classes separately. The habitat utilization-availability analysis indicated there was no consistent trend of attraction to or avoidance of infrastructure. Caribou frequently were more abundant than expected in the intervals close to infrastructure, and this trend was more pronounced for bulls and for total caribou of all sex/age classes than for calves. Log-linear regression (with Poisson error structure) of numbers of caribou and distance from infrastructure were also done, with and without combining data into the 1 km distance intervals. The analysis without intervals revealed no relationship between caribou distribution and distance from oil field infrastructure, or between caribou distribution and Julian date, year, or distance from the Beaufort Sea coast. The log-linear regression with caribou combined into distance intervals showed the density of bulls and total caribou of all sex/age classes declined with distance from infrastructure. Our results indicate that during the post-calving period: 1) caribou distribution is largely unrelated to distance from infrastructure; 2) caribou regularly use habitats in the PBOF; 3) caribou often occur close to infrastructure; and 4) caribou do not appear to avoid oil field infrastructure.

Effects of Hunting on Response Behaviors of Wild Reindeer

“…First, we compared the observed and expected numbers of reindeer east and west of the peninsulas for each year using a test comparing expected density based on area available (Neu et al 1974, Cronin 1998) for testing our first prediction of reduced number of animals on the western side of the infrastructure. The size of the area east and west of the barrier was used to calculate the expected number relative to the observed numbers, removing areas covered with water.…”

Caribou Use of Habitat Near Energy Development in Arctic Alaska

“…This approach is useful for quantifying specific thresholds in animal behavioral responses to habitat conditions, which can be difficult to identify directly from generalized linear models (Ficetola and Denoël , Boulanger et al ), even when disturbance covariates are incorporated (e.g., including a term for distance to disturbance in a GLMM). This approach also yielded results that could be evaluated in the context of earlier investigations of CAH densities within different 1‐km distance intervals to development (Cameron et al , ; Cronin et al ; Noel et al ).…”

Moose, Caribou, and Grizzly Bear Distribution in Relation to Road Traffic in Denali National Park, Alaska

“…The post-calving movements of cows with calves and accompanying individuals from the nearby calving grounds most likely account for the large caribou groups sighted in stratum 3. Cronin et al (1998) found that caribou were abundant in the Prudhoe Bay oil field and did not avoid oil field infrastructure. Bergerud et al (1984) provide several examples of caribou resilience to high levels of human disturbance.…”