2021
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.636225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case Report: Novel SAVI-Causing Variants in STING1 Expand the Clinical Disease Spectrum and Suggest a Refined Model of STING Activation

Abstract: Gain-of-function mutations in STING1 cause the monogenic interferonopathy, SAVI, which presents with early-onset systemic inflammation, cold-induced vasculopathy and/or interstitial lung disease. We identified 5 patients (3 kindreds) with predominantly peripheral vascular disease who harbor 3 novel STING1 variants, p.H72N, p.F153V, and p.G158A. The latter two were predicted by a previous cryo-EM structure model to cause STING autoactivation. The p.H72N variant in exon 3, however, is the first SAVI-causing vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Six case reports (34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39) and seven case series (40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46) reporting on SAVI could be identified (full text n = 9, conference abstracts n = 1, letters n = 3). Additional two articles (24,33) reported on the same study population (patients with SAVI, CANDLE, other interferonopathies).…”
Section: Evidence On Effectiveness and Safety For Sting Associated Va...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six case reports (34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39) and seven case series (40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46) reporting on SAVI could be identified (full text n = 9, conference abstracts n = 1, letters n = 3). Additional two articles (24,33) reported on the same study population (patients with SAVI, CANDLE, other interferonopathies).…”
Section: Evidence On Effectiveness and Safety For Sting Associated Va...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STING-associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy is associated with STING mutations, which lead to its spontaneous activation and accidental induction of IFN-I [ 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ]. Mechanistically, these mutations may trigger a conformational change of STING LBD, mimicking the consequence resulting from cGAMP binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two most frequent STING1 mutations i.e., V155M and N154S, located in the same mutation cluster (including other mutants, such as G166E, V147M or H72N [51]), are assumed to induce STING constitutive activation by promoting the 180 • rotation of the ligand-binding domain, thus resulting in STING oligomerization, independently of any interaction with its ligand cGAMP [52]. Other mutations in the second disease-causing mutation cluster (C206, R281, or R284) are thought to suppress the auto-inhibition of STING oligomerization [14].…”
Section: Savi Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%