Case Study: Does Following Best Practices Increase LibGuides Usage?

Brush, Denise

doi:10.1080/19322909.2022.2112798

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We used a Socratic approach and discussions were interspersed with thought-provoking questions that challenged our ideas. We reviewed traditional subject LibGuides (Brush, 2022), and EDI (Equality, Diversity and Inclusion) and UDL (Universal Design for Learning) featured prominently. We brainstormed potential solutions and evaluated these against frameworks such as Bloom's taxonomy, refined through sensemaking models (Dervin, 1998).…”

Section: Methodology and Processmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Lawyering Toolkit: a supportive tool to close the legal literacy gap between learners and practice professionals – a proof-of-concept report

Boyle,

Conrick,

Punch

et al. 2023

Legal Information Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three academic and one law firm librarian, Susan Boyle, Virginia Conrick, Pattie Punch, and Ann O'Sullivan collaborated to create a ‘Lawyering Toolkit’. It was devised to support learners on the legal lifecycle from higher education to the corporate sphere and beyond. Arranged by skills level, it was imagineered via the online BIALL Irish Group meetings during the Covid pandemic. Learning steps were visually scaffolded in LibGuides to build a quick reference platform. This article describes how the Toolkit proof-of-concept developed through experiential reflection and shared discussion. It tracks the construction of a prototype to presentation at BIALL Conference 2022 and incorporates feedback from the conference and the BIALL Irish Group. It is envisaged that the Lawyering Toolkit will ensure a more collaborative and consistent approach to legal information literacy in the Republic of Ireland.

show abstract

Section: Methodology and Processmentioning

confidence: 99%