Pipelines 2012 2012
DOI: 10.1061/9780784412480.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Case Study of Productivity Analysis for Horizontal Directional Drilling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several pre-reaming operations were required to achieve the final desired borehole diameter. Thus, the borehole was enlarged using 22, 26, 36, and 42 inch reamers (up to 140% of the product diameter) [24]. In general, the observed relative productivity rates are consistent with expectations based on the incremental diameters.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several pre-reaming operations were required to achieve the final desired borehole diameter. Thus, the borehole was enlarged using 22, 26, 36, and 42 inch reamers (up to 140% of the product diameter) [24]. In general, the observed relative productivity rates are consistent with expectations based on the incremental diameters.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…It is generally understood that soil conditions and drilling (reaming) diameter are the most critical conditions affecting HDD productivity. These conditions determine most of required features of the HDD rig, including size (e.g., thrust, torque) and type of equipment, and tools (reamers) [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation