2017
DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1336753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CD44 as a cancer stem cell marker and its prognostic value in patients with ovarian carcinoma

Abstract: We demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between low CD44 expression and serous papillary carcinoma histotype, tumour recurrence and chemoresistance at a value below 2%, however, CD44 was neither a prognostic factor of overall survival nor of disease-free interval. We propose to investigate other markers including other CSCs as a prognostic factors or potential aims for targeted therapy in ovarian cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Slug and snail are zinc finger transcription factors that regulate EMT in primary human cancers including pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, lung cancer, and ovarian cancer [25][26][27] . Cell surface receptor CD44 and urokinase receptor CD87 can be candidate stem cell markers for multiple solid tumors including breast cancer, head and neck cancer, and ovarian cancer [28][29][30][31] . Although CD44 was analyzed to have 26 stemness signature, we could not find CD87 as a stemness marker from the StemChecker 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slug and snail are zinc finger transcription factors that regulate EMT in primary human cancers including pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, lung cancer, and ovarian cancer [25][26][27] . Cell surface receptor CD44 and urokinase receptor CD87 can be candidate stem cell markers for multiple solid tumors including breast cancer, head and neck cancer, and ovarian cancer [28][29][30][31] . Although CD44 was analyzed to have 26 stemness signature, we could not find CD87 as a stemness marker from the StemChecker 32 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSCs share some common surface markers with normal stem cells, such as CD133, CD44, and CD99. 51 , 52 ESC nuclear transcription factors such as SOX-2, Oct3/4, Klf-4, Nanog, and c-Myc are also regarded as CSC markers. 53 55 One study showed that even Nestin, a specific marker of neural stem cells, can be used to identify CSCs.…”
Section: Tumor Inflammatory Microenvironmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One found that 17 biomarkers had been reported in other cancers, including ANXA2, TACSTD2, TNFSF10, HNRNPA2B1, RBP4, PPP1R13L, UGT8, VTN, BCAT1, PTPN2, PDIA6, MFAP4, GSTZ1, NUCB2, P4HB and PTBP1, which indicated our new found biomarkers were reliable. Numerous reported EOC protein biomarkers such as MUC16, MSLN, ERBB2, CHI3L1, MUC1, CD44, VTCN1 and CRP (Simon et al 2007, Chiang et al 2015, Stewart et al 2015, Jiang et al 2017, Bartakova et al 2018, Fortner et al 2018 were also identified in this iTRAQ proteomics study. It demonstrated that iTRAQ proteomic strategy is a reliable tool for identity of EOC biomarker.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…For example, VTCN1 was overexpressed in early-stage EOCs and was independent of CA125 expression (Simon et al 2007, Fortner et al 2018 and CDKN2A was the similar biomarker for early-stage EOCs (Jiang et al 2017). CD44, PLAT and PTBP1 showed prognostic value in EOC patients (Borgfeldt et al 2003, Zhang et al 2010, Bartakova et al 2018. Correlation between tumor mesothelin (MSLN) expression and serum MSLN in EOC patients was fine (Hanaoka et al 2017).…”
Section: Go Enrichment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%