1988
DOI: 10.1016/0196-6553(88)90053-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
3,167
4
189

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5,588 publications
(3,382 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
22
3,167
4
189
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, identification of pathogens that cause nosocomial infections and collection and analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility results of these pathogens from the hospital’s clinical microbiology laboratory have been performed (4). Definitions for nosocomial infection followed the guidelines of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance system (4,18). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, identification of pathogens that cause nosocomial infections and collection and analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility results of these pathogens from the hospital’s clinical microbiology laboratory have been performed (4). Definitions for nosocomial infection followed the guidelines of the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance system (4,18). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CDC definitions indicate that infants at risk for tracheitis and tracheobronchitis are those who experience signs of infection and respiratory disease (including new purulence in the sputum) without radiological confirmation of pneumonia. 28 Accordingly, only five symptomatic patients with abnormal WBC and normal chest X-rays had tracheitis. The remaining 13 constituted a group of mechanically ventilated VLBW infants with non-specific clinical deterioration unrelated to infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For each month, the number of B. cereus isolates from all of the specimens and the number of patients with B. cereus BSI were counted. BSI was defined as the isolation of B. cereus from at least two blood cultures from separate sites at the same time with signs and symptoms of infection (such as fever and chills) [13]. We considered the blood to be contaminated if patients had specific infection sites due to non-B.…”
Section: Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%