1962
DOI: 10.1017/s0022381600015449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CDU Deviancy in the German Bundestag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thames () found a tier difference in Russia, but not in Hungary or Ukraine, attributing this to differences in party institutionalization. A counterexample is seen in the oldest mixed system as district legislators in Germany in 1953–57 were less likely to deviate from the party vote (Rueckert and Crane ). This result could be due to the novelty of the system, with voters and legislators alike slow to adopt institutional incentives.…”
Section: Roll‐call Analysis In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thames () found a tier difference in Russia, but not in Hungary or Ukraine, attributing this to differences in party institutionalization. A counterexample is seen in the oldest mixed system as district legislators in Germany in 1953–57 were less likely to deviate from the party vote (Rueckert and Crane ). This result could be due to the novelty of the system, with voters and legislators alike slow to adopt institutional incentives.…”
Section: Roll‐call Analysis In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%