Methods for Studying the Genetics, Molecular Biology, Physiology, and Pathogenesis of the Streptococci 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-2258-2_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cell-based panning as a means to isolate phage display Fabs specific for a bacterial surface protein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases, reactive antibodies were isolated by screening against adhesive (+ fimbriae) and non‐adherent (– fimbriae) strains of S. parasanguis FW213. The specificity of MAbs F51, Ph5, and Ph12 for the Fap1 protein was demonstrated previously (Stephenson et al , 1998; Wu et al , 1998). In this study, the specificity of MAbs D10, A6, B20, and E42 for the Fap1 protein was demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In both cases, reactive antibodies were isolated by screening against adhesive (+ fimbriae) and non‐adherent (– fimbriae) strains of S. parasanguis FW213. The specificity of MAbs F51, Ph5, and Ph12 for the Fap1 protein was demonstrated previously (Stephenson et al , 1998; Wu et al , 1998). In this study, the specificity of MAbs D10, A6, B20, and E42 for the Fap1 protein was demonstrated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The antibodies used in this study are summarized in Table 1. Three monospecific antibodies (F51, Ph5 and Ph12) had been characterized previously with specificity for the Fap1 protein that runs at an apparent molecular weight of 200 kDa on SDS–PAGE (Stephenson et al , 1998; Wu et al , 1998). Western blot analysis revealed that the four remaining MAbs (D10, B20, E42 and A6) also reacted with the 200 kDa protein, thus demonstrating specificity for the Fap1 protein (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations