1991
DOI: 10.3109/17453679108999232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cement interface temperature in hip arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the peak bone temperature predicted by our thin mantle models were in the same range as those reported for cemented THA 29 and vertebroplasty in goats. 30 Correspondingly, no thermal damage was predicted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Conversely, the peak bone temperature predicted by our thin mantle models were in the same range as those reported for cemented THA 29 and vertebroplasty in goats. 30 Correspondingly, no thermal damage was predicted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But in both procedures the bulk cement volume was quite small; the cement mantle thickness typically is 2-3 mm for cemented THA, while on average 0.8 ml of cement was used for the vertebroplasty in goats. 30 Consequently, the interface temperatures remained low. In our worst case model the volume of bulk cement was much higher (15 ml), resulting in a higher peak temperature and the prediction of thermal necrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the results of the cadaver experiments for the PE cup acquired in this study are consistent to a certain extent with in vivo experiments, 33 which showed median maximum temperatures of 49°C (41°C to 67°C) in the uncooled condition and 41°C (37°C to 48°C) in the cooled condition (Table 3). In another in vivo study, 34 the mean curing temperature for PE cups was 43°C. An explanation for the difference could be that the initial mean acetabulum temperature was reported at 32°C instead of 37°C body temperature.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, an inherent problem of this reaction is the great amount of heat released during the bone cement preparation, which may cause the reaction temperature to increase above 100°C, possibly leading to irreparable damage of living tissues (Pascual et al, 1996). However, alternative preparation procedures have been suggested in order to reduce the high temperatures that may be reached during the bone cement preparation, such as the reduction of the operating room temperature (Meyer et al, 1973), the manipulation of the MMA / PMMA ratio (Haas et al, 1975) and the usage of cold chemicals (Dipisa et al, 1976;Toksvig-Larsen et al, 1991;Maffezzoli, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%