Cemented Patellar Implant Malposition: A Non-Issue for the Painful Total Knee Arthroplasty

Cherian, Nathan; Ohnoutka, Cole; Peissig, Evan J.; Hsing, Thomas M; Aggarwal, Ajay; Keeney, James A.

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.020

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Minneapolis Veteran’s Affairs (VA) [ 185 ] 3. Minnesota University [ 136 , 160 , 345 ] Missouri Barnes-Jewish HS Washington University [ 56 , 133 , 141 , 162 , 184 , 213 , 230 , 285 , 400 , 421 , 448 , 644 , 657 ] New Mexico (JRR) New Mexico Orthopaedics [ 16 ] New York 1. CHKR [ 74 ] 2.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II–IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review

Zgouridou,

Kenanidis,

Potoupnis

et al. 2023

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Four joint arthroplasty registries (JARs) levels exist based on the recorded data type. Level I JARs are national registries that record primary data. Hospital or institutional JARs (Level II–IV) document further data (patient-reported outcomes, demographic, radiographic). A worldwide list of Level II–IV JARs must be created to effectively assess and categorize these data. Methods Our study is a systematic scoping review that followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 648 studies. Based on their publications, the study aimed to map the existing Level II–IV JARs worldwide. The secondary aim was to record their lifetime, publications’ number and frequency and recognise differences with national JARs. Results One hundred five Level II–IV JARs were identified. Forty-eight hospital-based, 45 institutional, and 12 regional JARs. Fifty JARs were found in America, 39 in Europe, nine in Asia, six in Oceania and one in Africa. They have published 485 cohorts, 91 case-series, 49 case–control, nine cross-sectional studies, eight registry protocols and six randomized trials. Most cohort studies were retrospective. Twenty-three per cent of papers studied patient-reported outcomes, 21.45% surgical complications, 13.73% postoperative clinical and 5.25% radiographic outcomes, and 11.88% were survival analyses. Forty-four JARs have published only one paper. Level I JARs primarily publish implant revision risk annual reports, while Level IV JARs collect comprehensive data to conduct retrospective cohort studies. Conclusions This is the first study mapping all Level II–IV JARs worldwide. Most JARs are found in Europe and America, reporting on retrospective cohorts, but only a few report on studies systematically.

show abstract