2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2005.07.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Central-to-peripheral nuclear modification factors in Pb–Pb collisions atsNN=17.3 GeV

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, and Λ → π + p. The selection procedure is described in detail in [ 9]. The main criteria are the following: (a) the two decay tracks are compatible with the hypothesis of having a common origin point; (b) the reconstructed secondary vertex is well separated from the target; (c) the reconstructed candidate points back to the primary vertex position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, and Λ → π + p. The selection procedure is described in detail in [ 9]. The main criteria are the following: (a) the two decay tracks are compatible with the hypothesis of having a common origin point; (b) the reconstructed secondary vertex is well separated from the target; (c) the reconstructed candidate points back to the primary vertex position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of R CP and of its particle-species dependence, in particular the meson/baryon dependence, at top SPS energy allows to test for these phenomena at an energy smaller by about one order of magnitude ( √ s NN = 17.3 GeV). While measurements of the π 0 R CP by the WA98 Collaboration, supporting the presence of parton energy loss effects, were published already in 2002 [ 8], the first results on the particle-species dependence (unidentified negatively charged hadrons, K 0 S , Λ, and Λ) have been reported by the NA57 Collaboration in [ 9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, R AA was constructed by using the p+p parametrization of Blattnig et al [13], as al- [10], compared to predictions with and without parton energy loss [21,22]. Right.…”
Section: Baseline Measurements In P+p and P+amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to what has been seen at RHIC, the away-side peaks broadens with centrality, which might be attributed to in-medium effects. Recently, new data on R CP for identified particles have been presented by the NA49 and NA57 experiment [9,10]. Additionally, the NA45 collaboration has done a refined analysis of two particle azimuthal correlations at high p t [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have compared our results with perturbative-QCD-based theoretichal predictions [19,20] with and without in-medium energy loss, which include the initial-state partonic intrinsic p broadening tuned on the original Cronin effect data [21]. The calculations with in-medium energy loss describe the data much better [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%