Central Venous Pressure in Optimal Blood Volume Maintenance

Wilson, Jan; Grow, John B.; Demong, Charles V.; Prevedel, Arthur E.; Owens, J. Cuthbert

doi:10.1001/archsurg.1962.01310040035005

Cited by 219 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Measurement of CVP has been commonplace for more than 50 years since the pioneering work of Aubaniac, 1 Seldinger, 2 and Wilson et al 3 CVP is simply an intravascular pressure ideally measured in the superior vena cava. It is a false but widely held belief that CVP can be used to estimate intravascular volume status.…”

Section: Central Venous Pressurementioning

confidence: 99%

Hemodynamic Monitoring

Leibowitz¹

2009

ASA Refresher Courses in Anesthesiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Central Venous Pressurementioning

confidence: 99%

Hemodynamic Monitoring

Leibowitz¹

2009

ASA Refresher Courses in Anesthesiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The SV may be cannulated by an infraclavicular [15,81,82,84,85,[87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95] or supraclavicular [15,84,87,[96][97][98][99][100][101] approach. The SV may be cannulated by an infraclavicular [15,81,82,84,85,[87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95] or supraclavicular [15,84,87,[96][97][98][99][100][101] approach.…”

Section: Internal Jugular Veinmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Pneumothorax accounts for one-fourth to onethird of all reported complications, and its incidence ranges from 0 to 5%; its average overall incidence is 1 to 2% [82,86,92,93,95,[99][100][101]103,104,107,[112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119]. The incidence of pneumothorax varies inversely with the operator's experience and the number of &dquo;breaks&dquo; in technique [102,104,108,109,120].…”

Section: Internal Jugular Veinmentioning

confidence: 99%

Central Venous Catbeterization: A Comprehensive Review, Part II

Seneff

1987

J Intensive Care Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Address reprint requests to Dr Seneff at his present address.In Part I of this article, the indications and contraindications of central venous catheterization were reviewed, and the antecubital, external jugular, and femoral vein routes discussed. In Part II, the internal jugular and subclavian vein routes for central venous catheterization are reviewed, and an overview of catheter maintenance and infection control presented. The internal jugular vein and subclavian vein are the two most useful sites for central venous access. There is greater experience with the subclavian vein, and it is largely because of a perceived high complication rate associated with this approach that the internal jugular vein was cultivated as an access route in adults. The debate remains as to which route is preferable. In reality, each method has advantages in a given clinical situation. cava (SVC). In contradistinction, the left IJV joins the left SV at a near right angle, and any catheter inserted through the left IJV must negotiate this sharp turn [5][6][7][8].A knowledge of the anatomical structures neighboring the IJV is essential because they can be invaded by a misdirected needle. The ICA runs medial to the IJV. Behind the ICA, just outside the

show abstract

“…Through it the catheter may be passed into the inferior vena cava. A greater incidence of thrombo-embolic phenomena make this route less desirable (Wilson et al, 1962).…”

Section: (A) Intravenous Infusionmentioning

confidence: 99%