2012
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.06690-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cepheid Xpert MRSA Cycle Threshold in Discordant Colonization Results and as a Quantitative Measure of Nasal Colonization Burden

Abstract: We analyzed the cycle threshold (C T ) of PCR surveillance MRSA swabs obtained from veterans. Lower C T on admission was associated with a positive culture from nasal swabs at discharge. Compared to PCR, direct plating of nasal swabs performed poorly, especially for patients with an elevated C T . The C T is strongly correlated with quantitative nasal cultures. Clinical and infection control applications of the C T have yet to be defined and warrant further evaluation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean C T value of the false-positive (culture-negative and PCR-positive) samples was significantly higher than that of concordant samples (31.0 vs. 24.6). These findings are in line with the previous studies showing that the discrepancies between the Xpert MRSA assay and culture method occurred exclusively when the bacterial density was low [9] and agree with the fact that the C T value in the Xpert MRSA assay correlates strongly with the bacterial density in the samples [9, 14]. The discordance from the five false-negative results might be partially explained by the cases with low bacterial density of MRSA in the nostrils or disparity in the specimens from two nostrils (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The mean C T value of the false-positive (culture-negative and PCR-positive) samples was significantly higher than that of concordant samples (31.0 vs. 24.6). These findings are in line with the previous studies showing that the discrepancies between the Xpert MRSA assay and culture method occurred exclusively when the bacterial density was low [9] and agree with the fact that the C T value in the Xpert MRSA assay correlates strongly with the bacterial density in the samples [9, 14]. The discordance from the five false-negative results might be partially explained by the cases with low bacterial density of MRSA in the nostrils or disparity in the specimens from two nostrils (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In agreement with a prior report, we found a negative correlation between the C T value and the number of MRSA colonies in the nares. 27 We found a poor correlation between the C T value from the study’s nasal swabs and the nasal swabs collected by the hospital nurses. We believe this poor correlation reflects a wide variability in collection techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The capacity of this test to quantify organisms has been also reported by Stenehjem et al, who determined nasal colonization bioburdens in swabs using the Xpert MRSA test [26]. The most obvious benefit of this test is that it provides information on which to base the choice of antibiotic treatment for patients with suspected pneumonia in less than an hour after the sample arrives at the laboratory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%