2006
DOI: 10.1121/1.2358006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cepstral coefficients and hidden Markov models reveal idiosyncratic voice characteristics in red deer (Cervus elaphus) stags

Abstract: (2006) Cepstral coefficients and hidden Markov models reveal idiosyncratic voice characteristics in red deer (Cervus elaphus) stags. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120 (6). pp. [4080][4081][4082][4083][4084][4085][4086][4087][4088][4089] This version is available from Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/756/ This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies and may differ from the published version or from the version of record. If you wish to cite this item you … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed the HMM system based on the feature set in Table III presented an average identification rate of 95.5%. This method reached values at least similar to or even higher than the identification rates observed in automatic recognition approaches with mammals' (Campbell et al, 2000;Clemins, 2005;Reby et al, 1997Reby et al, , 2006 and birds' (Terry and McGregor, 2002;Trawicki, 2005) vocalizations. The comparison, however, is not straightforward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed the HMM system based on the feature set in Table III presented an average identification rate of 95.5%. This method reached values at least similar to or even higher than the identification rates observed in automatic recognition approaches with mammals' (Campbell et al, 2000;Clemins, 2005;Reby et al, 1997Reby et al, , 2006 and birds' (Terry and McGregor, 2002;Trawicki, 2005) vocalizations. The comparison, however, is not straightforward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In such cases, the segmentation was not perfect resulting in apparent insertion errors that were in fact boatwhistles. As such, insertion errors were not considered in the evaluation of the recognition system (also see Parsons and Jones, 2000;Reby et al, 2006;Trifa et al, 2008).…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Recognition Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of underwater bioacoustic signal has been the object of numerous publications, where several approaches have been proposed to recognize and classify these signals [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Much like birds, marine mammals are highly vocalizing animals and different species can be recognized by their specific sounds [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently HMMs have been used for classification or detection of vocalizations by African elephants Clemins and Johnson, 2006), red deer (Reby et al, 2006), and the ortolan bunting (Trawicki et al, 2005, Tao et al, 2008. There have been no computations with HMMs or GMMs on automatic classification of call types of marine mammal sounds.…”
Section: Hidden Markov Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%