Cervical cancer screening in Spain

Calvo, María Teresa; Rubio, Ángela Hernández; Aguilar, Ignacio Rosell

doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(00)00319-1

Cited by 14 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Görögországban 2011-ben indult a Nemzeti Méhnyakszűrő Program, amelyben szülésznő, ápoló is végezheti a kenetvételt, szerepük a nők részvételének támogatásában jelentős [21,30]. Spanyolországban 14 régióban zajlik uniós irányelvekhez közelítő méhnyakszűrés, a keneteket nőgyógyász mellett szülésznő veszi le [21,31]. Lengyelországban 2007-ben indult populációalapú szűrés a szülésznők bevonásával, 2010-re 5,7%-kal csökkent a méhnyakrák előfordulása, 3,4%-kal a halálozás, és a szűrési lefedettség 24%-ra növekedett 2012-re [32].…”

Section: A Képzés Során Kapott Ismeretek Megfelelőségeunclassified

A védőnői méhnyakszűrési pilot program értékelése

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: A Képzés Során Kapott Ismeretek Megfelelőségeunclassified

A védőnői méhnyakszűrési pilot program értékelése

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Examples of different programmes operating within one country can be seen in France, Italy, Greece, Belgium, Spain, Canada and Thailand, where some provinces or local government areas have population-based public health screening programmes while others rely on opportunistic screening [5,50,52,60,[71][72][73][74]. Populations also have different access to organised programmes based on factors other than geography.…”

Section: Descriptions Of Organised Programmes Show Diversity and Incomentioning

confidence: 99%

‘Organised’ cervical screening 45 years on: How consistent are organised screening practices?

Williams

Carter

Rychetnik

2014

European Journal of Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Organised screening programmes have been remarkably successful in reducing incidence and mortality from cervical cancer, while opportunistic screening varies in its effectiveness. Experts recommend that cervical screening or HPV testing be carried out only in the context of an organised programme. We sought to answer the following study questions: What does it mean for a cervical screening programme to be organised? Is there a place for opportunistic screening (in an organised programme)? We reviewed 154 peer-reviewed papers on organised and opportunistic approaches to cervical screening published between 1970 and 2014 to understand how the term 'organised' is used, formally and in practice. We found that despite broad recognition of a prescriptive definition of organisation, in practice the meaning of organisation is much less clear. Our review revealed descriptions of organised programmes that differ significantly from prescribed norms and from each other, and a variety of ways that opportunistic and organised programmes intersect. We describe the breadth of the variation in cervical cancer screening programmes and examine the relationships and overlaps between organised and opportunistic screening. Implications emerging from the review include the need to better understand the breadth of organisation in practice, the drivers and impacts of opportunistic screening and the impact of opportunistic screening on population programme outcomes. Appreciation of the complexity of cervical screening programmes will benefit both screeners and women as programmes are changed to reflect a partially vaccinated population, new evidence and new technologies.

show abstract

“…No organized national screening program exists in Spain [6], but recommendations propose that women aged 25 to 64 years should have a Pap smear every 3 to 5 years, following 2 to 3 consecutive normal cytologies. According to a recent population-based survey, opportunistic screening coverage is high (76%) in Spanish women aged 18 to 65 years [7].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%