2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cervical vertebral column morphology related to craniofacial morphology and head posture in preorthodontic children with Class II malocclusion and horizontal maxillary overjet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…7,8 Although the distance between S-N is used to measure the anterior cranial base, some authors claim that using point Ba or Ar is more accurate. 9 On the other hand, Bjork says that point Ar should be included in the analysis due to its easier identification on radiographs. 10 Varjanna et al used point Ba in their research because they considered that there is a larger distance between Ar and the cranial base.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Although the distance between S-N is used to measure the anterior cranial base, some authors claim that using point Ba or Ar is more accurate. 9 On the other hand, Bjork says that point Ar should be included in the analysis due to its easier identification on radiographs. 10 Varjanna et al used point Ba in their research because they considered that there is a larger distance between Ar and the cranial base.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, it could be hypothesized that fusion anomalies show a dimorphic pattern in their occurrence. 1 However, Sonnesen and Kjaer, 8 Faruqui et al, 1 and Arntsen and Sonnesen 28 attested that there was no significant gender difference in the occurrence of CVAs. Similarly, the current study did not reveal gender tendency for occurrence of CVA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[15] nalaze povezanost II skeletne klase i povećanog kraniocervikalnog ugla. Arntsen i Sonnesen [16] takođe nalaze povećanu estenziju glave u odnosu na vratnu kičmu kod osoba sa malokluzijama II klase. Do sličnih rezultata su došli i Gonzalez i Manns [17].…”
Section: Diskusijaunclassified
“…Name, kada je glava ekstendirana u odnosu na vratnu kičmu, to dovodi do istezanja kože lica i mišićnih pripoja na skeletu lica. Ovo istezanje izaziva porast sile koja deluje na skeletne strukture i može da ograniči rast maksile i mandibule unapred i usmeri ga više unazad.U ortodontskoj literaturi postoje studije koje su ispitivale uticaj položaja glave na kraniofacijalnu morfologiju i rast skeleta lica [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Položaj glave se procenjuje na osnovu kraniocervikalnog ugla koji formiraju osnovna ravan prednje kranijalne baze (NS), i tangenta odontoidnog procesusa (OPT) koja prolazi kroz krajnju zadnju donju tačku na telu drugog vratnog pršljena [2] Smer rasta lica zavisi od rasta pojedinih struktura lica i od njihovih uzajamnih odnosa.…”
unclassified