2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A systematic review on expectant management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some projections show that by 2030 nearly 30% of all deliveries will by cesarean section [ 54 ]. Although there are reports of healthy deliveries among patients who received expectant management, it is associated with relatively high morbidity and mortality rates; therefore, termination of CSP is currently recommended [ 55 ]. Chemoembolization and systemic methotrexate are both treatments for cesarean scar pregnancy, but UAC might be contraindicated in patients with serious symptoms or complications (eg, vaginal bleeding or hemodynamic instability) [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some projections show that by 2030 nearly 30% of all deliveries will by cesarean section [ 54 ]. Although there are reports of healthy deliveries among patients who received expectant management, it is associated with relatively high morbidity and mortality rates; therefore, termination of CSP is currently recommended [ 55 ]. Chemoembolization and systemic methotrexate are both treatments for cesarean scar pregnancy, but UAC might be contraindicated in patients with serious symptoms or complications (eg, vaginal bleeding or hemodynamic instability) [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then perpendicularly, the superior-inferior (S—I) diameter of the gestational sac is traced [ 15 , 16 ]. In COS-1, the gestational sac is implanted within the caesarean scar, and at least two-thirds of the S—I diameter of the gestational sac is above the endometrial line, towards the anterior uterine wall, and in COS-2 less than two-thirds of the S—I diameter is above the endometrial line [ 4 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review by Silva et al (2023) concludes Type 1 CSP has a significantly better outcome than Type 2, namely in gestational age at delivery, PAS diagnosis, requirement for hysterectomy and risk of uterine rupture [ 4 ]. The same correlation also verifies for COS-1 and COS-2 classifications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations