CHACQFAM : une base de données renseignant l’âge d’acquisition estimé et la familiarité pour 1225 mots monosyllabiques et bisyllabiques du Français

Lachaud, Christian

doi:10.4074/s0003503307001030

Cited by 21 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The stimuli for the memory task were 40 triads of French words (e.g., Dog -Frog -Bee). All words were selected to be included in the vocabulary of 8 year olds (Lachaud, 2007). Half the triads (N = 20) were so-called phonological triads because they were composed of words that were phonologically related (e.g., Bat -Cat -Hat) and, thus, were more likely to be remembered with the help of a phonological cue (e.g., "word ending = AT").…”

Section: Stimulimentioning

confidence: 99%

From domain-specific to domain-general? The developmental path of metacognition for strategy selection

Geurten

Meulemans

Lemaire

2018

Cognitive Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

From domain-specific to domain-general? The developmental path of metacognition for strategy selection Metacognition, typically defined as the ability to evaluate (or monitor) and regulate (or control) the success of cognitive processes (Dunlosky & Metcalfe, 2009), has been regarded as a fundamental skill influencing cognitive performance and learning in domains as diverse as arithmetic, memory, reading, perception, and many others (Kuhn, 2000). Generally, metacognition is viewed as a global ability that is correlated across content domains, suggesting that participants who are good at evaluating their performance for one sort of task also tend to be good at evaluating their performance for another sort of task (Schraw, Dunkle, Bendixen, & Roedel, 1995). Domain-General or Domain-Specific Metacognition Processes? In adults, the assumption that metacognition is domain-general is supported by two types of evidence. First, a number of behavioral studies seem to indicate that inter-individual differences in measures of metacognitive sensitivity (i.e., how well one can discriminate between correct and incorrect responses through the monitoring of one's own performance) correlated across unrelated cognitive tasks (e.g.

show abstract

Section: Stimulimentioning

confidence: 99%

From domain-specific to domain-general? The developmental path of metacognition for strategy selection

Geurten

Meulemans

Lemaire

2018

Cognitive Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The 720-word corpus was selected on the basis of age of acquisition (7 years) as defined in Ferrand, Grainger, and New (2003), Lachaud (2007), and Niedenthal et al (2004). We divided the entire corpus into 12 questionnaires of 60 words and developed two versions of a questionnaire with the same words arranged in two different randomized orders.…”

Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Affective norms for 720 French words rated by children and adolescents (FANchild)

Monnier

Syssau

2016

Behav Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

FANchild (French Affective Norms for Children) provides norms of valence and arousal for a large corpus of French words (N = 720) rated by 908 French children and adolescents (ages 7, 9, 11, and 13). The ratings were made using the Self-Assessment Manikin (Lang, 1980). Because it combines evaluations of arousal and valence and includes ratings provided by 7-, 9-, 11-, and 13-year-olds, this database complements and extends existing French-language databases. Good response reliability was observed in each of the four age groups. Despite a significant level of consensus, we found age differences in both the valence and arousal ratings: Seven-and 9-year-old children gave higher mean valence and arousal ratings than did the other age groups. Moreover, the tendency to judge words positively (i.e., positive bias) decreased with age. This age-and sex-related database will enable French-speaking researchers to study how the emotional character of words influences their cognitive processing, and how this influence evolves with age. FANchild is available at https:// www.researchgat e.net /profi le/Catherine_ Monnier/contributions.

show abstract

“…Out of the 5,962 words of the FLP that had one root and one suffix (i.e., PRS 0-1-1), we selected the 917 nouns in common with the available French database for imageability (Desrochers & Thompson, 2009). Only ten had values for age of acquisition in French (Lachaud, 2007), and none of the 917 had values for concreteness (Bonin, Méot, & Bugaiska, 2018). It is noteworthy that both databases contain mostly monosyllabic words (only 137 words are bisyllabic).…”

Section: Methods Materialsmentioning

confidence: 99%

MorphoLex-FR: A derivational morphological database for 38,840 French words

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Studies on morphological processing in French, as in other languages, have shown disparate results. We argue that a critical and long-overlooked factor that could underlie these diverging results is the methodological differences in the calculation of morphological variables across studies. To address the need for a common morphological database, we present MorphoLex-FR, a sizeable and freely available database with 12 variables for prefixes, roots, and suffixes for the 38,840 words of the French Lexicon Project. MorphoLex-FR constitutes a first step to render future studies addressing morphological processing in French comparable. The procedure we used for morphological segmentation and variable computation is effectively the same as that in MorphoLex, an English morphological database. This will allow for cross-linguistic comparisons of future studies in French and English that will contribute to our understanding of how morphologically complex words are processed. To validate these variables, we explored their influence on lexical decision latencies for morphologically complex nouns in a series of hierarchical regression models. The results indicated that only morphological variables related to the suffix explained lexical decision latencies. The frequency and family size of the suffix exerted facilitatory effects, whereas the percentage of more frequent words in the morphological family of the suffix was inhibitory. Our results are in line with previous studies conducted in French and in English. In conclusion, this database represents a valuable resource for studies on the effect of morphology in visual word processing in French. Keywords Morphology. Psycholinguistic variables. Lexical decision. Database. Visual word recognition. French Morphemes are the smallest meaningful units in a language. This means that we can process and understand words that include more than one morpheme on the basis of their constituent morphemes, even if we have never encountered them before (Feldman, Milin, Cho, Moscoso del Prado Martín, & O'Connor, 2015). For example, when reading the invented word equalism for the first time we can recognize the form and meaning of its two morphemes: equal (its root) and-ism

show abstract

CHACQFAM : une base de données renseignant l’âge d’acquisition estimé et la familiarité pour 1225 mots monosyllabiques et bisyllabiques du Français

Cited by 21 publications

References 38 publications

From domain-specific to domain-general? The developmental path of metacognition for strategy selection

From domain-specific to domain-general? The developmental path of metacognition for strategy selection

Affective norms for 720 French words rated by children and adolescents (FANchild)

MorphoLex-FR: A derivational morphological database for 38,840 French words

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About