Challenges and opportunities caring for neurology outpatients across language differences

Abstract

BackgroundWith over 66 million Americans who speak over 350 languages other than English at home, we sought to examine attitudes and behaviors of neurology clinicians and staff when communicating across language differences.MethodsWe conducted an electronic-enabled cross-sectional survey of clinicians and patient services coordinators working at an academic neurology outpatient clinic. Questions focused on professional medical interpreter (PMI) services usage, satisfaction, and perceived barriers to utilization.ResultsA total of 82/235 (35%) neurology clinicians and 24/52 (46%) coordinators met the study eligibility criteria. Most clinicians (96%) reported seeing at least 1 non–English-speaking patient and using PMI services (85%) in the last month. Most commonly self-reported interpretation modalities were face-to-face PMI services (39%) and patients' family members or friends (28%). Perceived barriers to using PMI included time constraints (60%) and lack of available face-to-face PMI (51%). Among patient services coordinators, 33% reported consistently asking patients their preferred language and 50% if they needed a PMI for appointments. Most respondents (77% clinicians and 71% coordinators) were satisfied with PMI services. Recommendations included having more available face-to-face PMI, greater coordinated efforts to preschedule PMI, and more education on the effective use of PMI.ConclusionsMore than 70% of outpatient neurology clinicians and patient services coordinators were satisfied with PMI. However, their perceived barriers and reported practices suggest a need for updated policies and education to improve the use of PMI services.

Enhancing Medical Communication and Care Through Professional Medical Interpreters

“…Hence, they have reduced confidence in interaction with PMIs, who in turn are scarce. 3,8 A study from New Jersey examined whether availability of in-person professional interpreter services during emergency department visits affected the satisfaction of patients with LEP and their health care clinicians. Regression-adjusted results indicated that 96% of patients and their clinicians were satisfied when an in-person interpreter was available compared with when other forms of interpretation were used.…”