2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2022.107925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges and opportunities in carbon capture, utilization and storage: A process systems engineering perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 417 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Raw material costs and product and byproduct selling prices are presented in Table , respectively. It is worth noting that the actual costs of carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies remain uncertain . In fact, Cai et al projected a cost range of $ 0.02 to $ 0.08 per kilogram of CO 2 by 2025 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Raw material costs and product and byproduct selling prices are presented in Table , respectively. It is worth noting that the actual costs of carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies remain uncertain . In fact, Cai et al projected a cost range of $ 0.02 to $ 0.08 per kilogram of CO 2 by 2025 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the actual costs of carbon capture, utilization, and storage technologies remain uncertain. 40 In fact, Cai et al projected a cost range of $ 0.02 to $ 0.08 per kilogram of CO 2 by 2025. 41 Recently, Pedrozo et al have addressed an equation-oriented optimization applied to the optimal design of carbon capture plants using rigorous models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of optimization approaches for decision-making has the potential to reduce the costs of chemical absorption-based carbon capture. , Simulation-based optimization methods are usually employed to address the optimal design of carbon capture plants due to the use of highly nonlinear rigorous models. For instance, genetic algorithms and Particle Swarm Optimization have been used to optimize carbon capture technologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13−18 The potential economic incentive of such a production must be valued against its operating costs, since this option has shown to be costly and energy intensive. 19 Another option worthy of consideration is the use of ecosystems provided by nature, which may yield multiple goods and services by using carbon dioxide as one of their substrates. Such systems include forests and woodlands that provide valuable goods and benefits to society, such as provisioning, regulating, cultural, and supporting services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other options that have been developed for CO 2 mitigation include the implementation of carbon utilization processes (CUPs) in order to use the CO 2 captured by PCC systems as raw material to produce fuels and value-added chemicals. The potential economic incentive of such a production must be valued against its operating costs, since this option has shown to be costly and energy intensive …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%