2016
DOI: 10.1177/1534484316673177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges for the Theory and Practice of Business Coaching

Abstract: P: +61 7 4781 4254Professor Gianna Moscardo has qualifications in applied psychology and sociology. Her qualifications in applied psychology and sociology support her research interests in understanding how communities and organisations perceive, plan for, and manage tourism development opportunities and how tourists learn about and from their travel experiences. CHALLENGES FOR THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF BUSINESS COACHING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE AbstractUntil recently there has been little … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
(309 reference statements)
2
70
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…This will enable elements of the process to be altered and refined, in order better to meet the client's specific needs. According to the proposed model and other texts (i.e., Joo 2005;Passmore and Fillery-Travis 2011;Bozer et al 2014b;Rekalde et al 2015;Blackman et al 2016), the main variables conditioning the result of the coaching experience are: the performance of the coach, the readiness of the coachee, the relationship between coach and coachee, the characteristics of the coaching process and the organizational context. The hypothesized model therefore proposes a formative evaluation of the 'coach', 'coachee', 'relationship' and 'process' variables, analyzing their influence on coachee satisfaction, which impacts favorably on the results of the intervention.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This will enable elements of the process to be altered and refined, in order better to meet the client's specific needs. According to the proposed model and other texts (i.e., Joo 2005;Passmore and Fillery-Travis 2011;Bozer et al 2014b;Rekalde et al 2015;Blackman et al 2016), the main variables conditioning the result of the coaching experience are: the performance of the coach, the readiness of the coachee, the relationship between coach and coachee, the characteristics of the coaching process and the organizational context. The hypothesized model therefore proposes a formative evaluation of the 'coach', 'coachee', 'relationship' and 'process' variables, analyzing their influence on coachee satisfaction, which impacts favorably on the results of the intervention.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Model klinik bisnis yang diterapkan menggunakan metode executive coaching, yang berarti pemilik usaha langsung atau orang yang berperan dalam pengambilan keputusan bisnis. Tujuannya adalah untuk mempermudah proses transfer pengetahuan dari pihak manajemen puncak ke para pegawainya (Blackman, Moscardo, & Gray, 2016;Thorpe, Holt, Macpherson, & Pittaway, 2005). Klinik bisnis umumnya dilakukan minimal selama 2 kali selama 1 bulan, dimana setiap sesi berlangsung selama 3 jam.…”
Section: Pendampingan Usaha (Klinik Bisnis)unclassified
“…Until recently, the workplace coaching literature has been dominated by practitioner‐led research, predominately published in niche coaching journals and “grey literature” (for a comprehensive review see Bozer & Jones, ) and as such, coaching is viewed by some as a practice field. However, recent publications in high‐ranking scientific journals, indicate that a shift is occurring in the literature on workplace coaching, with a move towards scientific‐led rather than practitioner‐led scholarship (e.g., Athanasopoulou & Dopson, ; Blackman, Moscardo, & Gray, ; Bozer & Jones, ; Hui & Sue‐Chan, ; Jones et al, ). Moreover, this shift fits with a broader trend in applied psychology towards more rigorous evaluation studies of workplace interventions (e.g., O'Shea, O'Connell & Gallagher, ).…”
Section: Background and Rationale For The Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%