Recent Advances in Polyphenol Research 2021
DOI: 10.1002/9781119545958.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in Analyzing Bioactive Proanthocyanidins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 228 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies indicated that oligomeric (mDP 4–10) and polymeric (mDP > 10) proanthocyanidins can be found in the lingonberry matrix as well [ 2 , 32 ], thus suggesting unidentified larger polymeric molecules in our tested sample. Nevertheless, liquid chromatography coupled to photodiode-array or mass detection may be useful for authentication, but it is not suitable for accurate quantification since not all analytical standards are available and response factors for the individual polymers are unknown [ 33 , 34 ]. Quantification problems are usually overcome by the DMAC spectrophotometric assay, which is regarded as a simple, rapid, robust, and relatively specific technique for the evaluation of the total amount of proanthocyanidins [ 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies indicated that oligomeric (mDP 4–10) and polymeric (mDP > 10) proanthocyanidins can be found in the lingonberry matrix as well [ 2 , 32 ], thus suggesting unidentified larger polymeric molecules in our tested sample. Nevertheless, liquid chromatography coupled to photodiode-array or mass detection may be useful for authentication, but it is not suitable for accurate quantification since not all analytical standards are available and response factors for the individual polymers are unknown [ 33 , 34 ]. Quantification problems are usually overcome by the DMAC spectrophotometric assay, which is regarded as a simple, rapid, robust, and relatively specific technique for the evaluation of the total amount of proanthocyanidins [ 34 , 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%