2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10096-019-03472-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in diagnosing Zika—experiences from a reference laboratory in a non-endemic setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivities up till 68% were reported in panels limiting the number of days pso (Lustig et al 2017;Steinhagen et al 2016). The low sensitivity and short duration of positivity of the Euroimmun IgM ELISA is the reason why the IFA Arbovirus Fever Mosaic 2 was added to our diagnostic portfolio already soon after the start of the ZIKV outbreak and why IgM and IgG detection should be combined (Van den Bossche et al 2019). Sensitivity of the NS1 based NovaLisa® Zika IgM μ-capture ELISA (NovaTec Immundiagnostica GmbH, Dietzenbach, Germany) was 65% between 2 and 118 and 69.8% between 1 and 164 days pso (Basile et al 2018;Safronetz et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivities up till 68% were reported in panels limiting the number of days pso (Lustig et al 2017;Steinhagen et al 2016). The low sensitivity and short duration of positivity of the Euroimmun IgM ELISA is the reason why the IFA Arbovirus Fever Mosaic 2 was added to our diagnostic portfolio already soon after the start of the ZIKV outbreak and why IgM and IgG detection should be combined (Van den Bossche et al 2019). Sensitivity of the NS1 based NovaLisa® Zika IgM μ-capture ELISA (NovaTec Immundiagnostica GmbH, Dietzenbach, Germany) was 65% between 2 and 118 and 69.8% between 1 and 164 days pso (Basile et al 2018;Safronetz et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acute samples were obtained between day 1 to 5 AOS and three convalescent samples: early, between day 10 to 28 AOS; mid, between day 65-126 AOS; and late, day 142 to 203 AOS were also obtained. Immunoreactivity was further characterized by measuring neutralizing Abs (NAbs) against the four DENV serotypes, ZIKV, and CHIKV using in house whole virus neutralization tests ( 39 , 40 ), and against YFV using PRNT ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main serological tests for the diagnosis of ZIKV infection include ELISA for the detection of antibodies IgM and IgG against ZIKV [30]. Additionally, other serological methods such as immunofluorescence assays (IFA), immunoblots and (chemiluminescent) microsphere immunoassays (CMIA) are also being used [61,62]. Generally, a positive IgM indicates a recent infection, while a positive IgG result indicates a past flavivirus infection (presumptive positive infection of ZIKV or other flaviviruses) [63].…”
Section: Screening and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%