Challenging medical knowledge translation: convergence and divergence of translation across epistemic and cultural boundaries

Ødemark, John; Engebretsen, Eivind

doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01088-6

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Power differentials in change partnerships may benefit from a deeper, more critical analysis 97–101 . For example, critical analysis of arguments, disputes, and procedures can reveal how epistemic power is wielded (some kinds of knowledge are valued, whereas other kinds are ignored) 52,102–104 …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[97][98][99][100][101] For example, critical analysis of arguments, disputes, and procedures can reveal how epistemic power is wielded (some kinds of knowledge are valued, whereas other kinds are ignored). 52,[102][103][104] Rule 3: Engage with Conflict, Which Can Be a Positive Force. Rationalist models depict change as a nonpolitical and consensus-driven process in which conflict does not (or should not) exist.…”

Section: Synthesis: Ten Rules Of Thumbmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Toward a Values‐Informed Approach to Complexity in Health Care: Hermeneutic Review

Greenhalgh

Engebretsen²,

Bal

et al. 2023

Milbank Quarterly

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Policy Points The concept of value complexity (complexity arising from differences in people's worldviews, interests, and values, leading to mistrust, misunderstanding, and conflict among stakeholders) is introduced and explained. Relevant literature from multiple disciplines is reviewed. Key theoretical themes, including power, conflict, language and framing, meaning‐making, and collective deliberation, are identified. Simple rules derived from these theoretical themes are proposed.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Synthesis: Ten Rules Of Thumbmentioning

confidence: 99%

Toward a Values‐Informed Approach to Complexity in Health Care: Hermeneutic Review

Greenhalgh

Engebretsen²,

Bal

et al. 2023

Milbank Quarterly

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The emerging critique and KT perspective reflect concerns about how scientific evidence and expertise has been privileged at the expense of culturally situated knowledge and humanistic values. Critics view such privileging as an expression of scientism or positivism or as a way of promoting “the scientific logos” (Greenhalgh and Engebretsen, 2022 ; Ødemark and Engebretsen, 2022 ). Such labels denote the broad range of ongoing tensions, challenges, discontents, and disaffection associated with the role of scientific expertise and evidence in public policy, or what has been referred to as “the science-policy nexus” (Hoppe, 2005 ).…”

Section: Emerging Perspectivesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Wicked problems in a post-truth political economy: a dilemma for knowledge translation

Tieu,

Lawless,

Hunter

et al. 2023

Humanit Soc Sci Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The discipline of knowledge translation (KT) emerged as a way of systematically understanding and addressing the challenges of applying health and medical research in practice. In light of ongoing and emerging critique of KT from the medical humanities and social sciences disciplines, KT researchers have become increasingly aware of the complexity of the translational process, particularly the significance of culture, tradition and values in how scientific evidence is understood and received, and thus increasingly receptive to pluralistic notions of knowledge. Hence, there is now an emerging view of KT as a highly complex, dynamic, and integrated sociological phenomenon, which neither assumes nor creates knowledge hierarchies and neither prescribes nor privileges scientific evidence. Such a view, however, does not guarantee that scientific evidence will be applied in practice and thus poses a significant dilemma for KT regarding its status as a scientific and practice-oriented discipline, particularly within the current sociopolitical climate. Therefore, in response to the ongoing and emerging critique of KT, we argue that KT must provide scope for relevant scientific evidence to occupy an appropriate position of epistemic primacy in public discourse. Such a view is not intended to uphold the privileged status of science nor affirm the “scientific logos” per se. It is proffered as a counterbalance to powerful social, cultural, political and market forces that are able to challenge scientific evidence and promote disinformation to the detriment of democratic outcomes and the public good.

show abstract

“…I nie jest to przypadkowa koincydencja, ponieważ związki obu koncepcji są bardzo silne. TW jest bowiem metodą operacjonalizacji EBM [40], a inaczej mówiąc -skróceniem drogi od dowodu do wyniku [41]. W jednym z artykułów powiedziano, że EBHC jest mapą drogową dla TW [42].…”

Section: Translacja Wiedzyunclassified

There’s nothing better (yet?) for improving evidence-based practice than knowledge translation

Cianciara

Andrzej

Pruszyński

2022

J Educ Health Sport

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control entered into force 55 years after the first publication on relationship between smoking and lung cancer. The need to increase use of evidence into practice is widely emphasized. Purpose. Presentation of the knowledge translation process and discussion of the basis on which this concept was created. The state of knowledge. The concept of knowledge translation was created at the beginning of the 21st century in response to problems related to the production and dissemination of scientific evidence, including the so-called the know-do gap. These problems constitute a significant barrier to adherence to the principles of evidence-based medicine and practice. The translation of knowledge is seen as an operationalization of the above principles and a shortening of the path from evidence to effect. There are many approaches to knowledge translation, and there are problems and limitations in evaluating this process. This can cause confusion amongst stakeholders in the health system. Conclusions. Knowledge translation is a developmental and increasingly popular concept. There is no (yet?) better tool to improve evidence-based practice, both in medicine and public health than knowledge translation. The issue of knowledge translation should be disseminated in literature, tested in research, raised in discourse and implemented in health professionals education in Poland.

show abstract

Challenging medical knowledge translation: convergence and divergence of translation across epistemic and cultural boundaries

Cited by 9 publications

References 16 publications

Toward a Values‐Informed Approach to Complexity in Health Care: Hermeneutic Review

Toward a Values‐Informed Approach to Complexity in Health Care: Hermeneutic Review

Wicked problems in a post-truth political economy: a dilemma for knowledge translation

There’s nothing better (yet?) for improving evidence-based practice than knowledge translation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About