Changes at Corporate Headquarters: Review, Integration and Future Research

Abstract

In modern corporations, the corporate headquarters (CHQ) unit is considered central to the fortunes of the overall firm. In light of ever‐changing environments, changes at the CHQ have become a crucial concern in management research and practice, and scholars have studied a variety of changes at the CHQ. Despite the common focus on the CHQ entity and the potential for cross‐fertilization across several research tracks, a coherent picture of this dispersed body of knowledge is lacking. This paper reviews 25 years of research on changes at the CHQ. In so doing, it advances a common language and an overarching framework that integrates the existing knowledge in the intellectual domains of strategy, organizational design and international business research. On this basis, the authors suggest directions for future research to advance knowledge of: (1) the pressure for and resistance to changes at the CHQ; (2) interrelationships among changes at the CHQ; (3) change processes at the CHQ; (4) agents involved in changes at the CHQ; and (5) adaptive and disruptive effects of changes at the CHQ. Overall, the study provides a conceptual basis for combining the existing knowledge of changes at the CHQ and serves as a guide for future research.

Technological Diversification: A Systematic Review of Antecedents, Outcomes and Moderating Effects

“…First, we conducted an informal search to identify the most suitable search terms, which we then applied in a formal electronic database search. We used the EBSCO Host Business Source Premier database (Christoffersen 2013), which offers access to leading management journals such as AMJ, ASQ, AMR, MS, SMJ, JOM, JMS, OS and BJM, as well as specialized innovation and technology management journals including RP, Technovation and IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (Kunisch et al 2015;Niesten and Jolink 2015). We applied the filters 'academic journals', 'peer-reviewed' and 'Language = English', to limit the results to academically relevant content.…”

Boundary Spanning Activities of Corporate HQ Executives Insights from a Longitudinal Study

“…Consistent with this view, a sizable body of literature has emerged over the last two decades looking at the changing nature of the corporate HQ in MNCs, and in particular at the extent to which HQ seeks to provide a value‐added function to subsidiary units around the world (Ambos and Mahnke, ; Campbell et al, ; Kunisch et al, ). Some studies have focused on the different ways the HQ adds value to its network of subsidiary operations (Ambos et al, ; Chandler, ; Foss, ), others have examined the movement of HQ operations to overseas locations (Birkinshaw et al, ; Laamanen et al, ; Strauss‐Kahn and Vives, ), and the creation of ‘virtual’ HQs without a fixed location (Pasternak and Viscio, ; Prahalad and Bhattacharyya, ).…”

The legitimacy of subsidiary issue selling: Balancing positive & negative attention from corporate headquarters

“…The structure of the corporate headquarters (CHQ)-subsidiary relationship has evolved from a focus on formal bureaucratic control to an informal differentiated network (Kostova et al 2016;Kunisch et al 2014). Subsidiaries are often encouraged to compete for resources from their CHQ, but arguably the most valuable and limited of these resources is the way the CHQ's 'attention' is devolved across the MNE Bouquet & Birkinshaw, 2008a;Bouquet et al 2016).…”