2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.07.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in Left Atrial Appendage Dimensions Following Volume Loading During Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Abstract: Intraprocedural volume loading with saline increased the LAA orifice and depth dimensions during LAA closure. Operators should consider optimizing the left atrial pressure with volume loading before final device sizing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The challenges of using TEE for procedural planning mirrors the similar experience seen in 2D‐TEE sizing for the aortic annulus, where the varied anatomy of the appendage cannot be fully understood by multiple single plane interrogations but with volumetric data (Figure ). Variable loading conditions, appendage contractile cycle, and individualized anatomy all play a role in making 2D LAA measurements inaccurate and can be overcome with CT . Similar to our preliminary study, CT LAA widest measurement exceeded 2D‐TEE measurements by a mean of 1.83 ± 0.9 and 2.6 ± 2.3 mm in the CT and 2D‐TEE cohorts respectively and 2.2 ± 1.8 mm for the entire cohort which is comparable to the results from our pilot study (2.7 ± 2.2 mm) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The challenges of using TEE for procedural planning mirrors the similar experience seen in 2D‐TEE sizing for the aortic annulus, where the varied anatomy of the appendage cannot be fully understood by multiple single plane interrogations but with volumetric data (Figure ). Variable loading conditions, appendage contractile cycle, and individualized anatomy all play a role in making 2D LAA measurements inaccurate and can be overcome with CT . Similar to our preliminary study, CT LAA widest measurement exceeded 2D‐TEE measurements by a mean of 1.83 ± 0.9 and 2.6 ± 2.3 mm in the CT and 2D‐TEE cohorts respectively and 2.2 ± 1.8 mm for the entire cohort which is comparable to the results from our pilot study (2.7 ± 2.2 mm) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, TEE values were often obtained at a fasting state, and patients may not be adequately volume loaded prior to obtaining measurements. We previously showed that giving 500–1,000 cc saline loading and ensuring left atrial pressure >12 mmHg increased mean LAA dimension by ∼2 mm . Thus, LAA dimensions are sensitive to volume status, which should be optimized before choosing device size accordingly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, LAA is more compliant than the LA main chamber and plays an important role in the presence of LA pressure and/or volume overload [26,27]. The separation between LAA and LA after complete endothelialization of the device results in the disappearance of this LAA reservoir function [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%