1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(89)80057-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changes in peripheral venous tone before the onset of hypertension in women with gestational hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 However, Weinstein et al 13 and Hunyor 14 reported no difference in venous distensibility between normotensive pregnant and hypertensive pregnant women. Pickles et al 16 reported larger venous distensibility in women with preeclampsia before they developed preeclampsia. Thus, the reported results are variable.…”
Section: Venous Distensibility During Preeclampsiamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 However, Weinstein et al 13 and Hunyor 14 reported no difference in venous distensibility between normotensive pregnant and hypertensive pregnant women. Pickles et al 16 reported larger venous distensibility in women with preeclampsia before they developed preeclampsia. Thus, the reported results are variable.…”
Section: Venous Distensibility During Preeclampsiamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, this study was cross-sectional, and they did not examine whether it was reversible postpartum. Pickles et al 16 reported increased venous distensibility during preeclampsia. Thus, the reported results are variable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Normotensive pregnancy is associated with a progressive venodilatation. 146 There are changes in venous distensibility and capacitance, to accommodate the increased flow on the venous side, both distensibility 147 and capacitance being higher in the normal pregnant than in the non-pregnant woman. In non-pregnant women, venous capacitance is greater in the leg than in the forearm, but in pregnancy, this difference is lost, presumably because of the haemodynamic effect of the gravid uterus.…”
Section: The Cardiovascular Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…144 Women with GH have significantly-raised forearm venous tone by comparison with normal pregnant women, 148 but interestingly, a prospective study showed this to be preceded by a period of increased venodilatation. 146 When the central blood volume in such women was increased by a period of passive leg elevation, the women with GH showed venodilatation, unlike normal pregnant women or non-pregnant women, who showed no change. 148 Furthermore, forearm blood flow in women with GH or PE was either unchanged 144 or somewhat increased.…”
Section: The Cardiovascular Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility should be considered that an increase in venous return also plays a major role. In the literature, numerous data indicate a significant increase in venous capacitance (11,17,18,28,35,47). However, significant discrepancies have also been reported, depending mainly on the site of measurement of venous variables (40, 46).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%