Changes in Pharyngeal Airway Space and Oxygen Saturation Following Mandibular Setback Surgery: A Narrative Review

Fatani, Bader; Fatani, Omar; Fatani, Ahmed; Fatani, Jumana A; Al-Safadi, Afraa

doi:10.7759/cureus.31178

Cited by 6 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 26 publications

(68 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When utilizing ChatGPT, an enhancement in scientific writing becomes evident; it enables dataset analysis, literature review, resource optimization, personalized learning, and the promotion of critical thinking. However, it is recommended not to fully rely on this tool for academic tasks 10,11 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial intelligence: ChatGPT as a disruptive didactic strategy in dental education

Saravia‐Rojas,

Camarena‐Fonseca,

León‐Manco

et al. 2024

Journal of Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeTo evaluate the influence of ChatGPT on academic tasks performed by undergraduate dental students.MethodFifty‐five participants completed scientific writing assignments. First, ChatGPT was utilized; subsequently, a conventional method involving the search of scientific articles was employed. Each task was preceded by a 30‐min training session. The assignments were reviewed by professors, and an anonymous questionnaire was administered to the students regarding the usefulness of ChatGPT. Data were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U‐test.ResultsFinal scores and scores for the criteria of utilization of evidence, evaluation of arguments, and generation of alternatives achieved higher values through the traditional method than with ChatGPT (p = 0.019, 0.042, 0.017, and <0.001, respectively). No differences were found between the two methods for the remaining criteria (p > 0.05). A total of 64.29% of the students found ChatGPT useful, 33.33% found it very useful, and 3.38% not very useful. Regarding its application in further academic activities, 54.76% considered it useful, 40.48% found it very useful, and 4.76% not very useful. A total of 61.90% of the participants indicated that ChatGPT contributed to over 25% of their productivity, while 11.9% perceived it contributed to less than 15%. Concerning the relevance of having known ChatGPT for academic tasks, 50% found it opportune, 45.24% found it very opportune, 2.38% were unsure, and the same percentage thought it is inopportune. All students provided positive feedback.ConclusionDental students highly valued the experience of using ChatGPT for academic tasks. Nonetheless, the traditional method of searching for scientific articles yield higher scores.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Artificial intelligence: ChatGPT as a disruptive didactic strategy in dental education

Saravia‐Rojas,

Camarena‐Fonseca,

León‐Manco

et al. 2024

Journal of Dental Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The urge to do good and avoid evil, to command the good and forbid the evil, to love what is good and avoid what is bad, to follow the truth and reject falsehood." 9 From these various definitions, we find that the substance of da'wah is all efforts to convey (tabligh), spread Islamic thought (nasyr al fikrah), direct (taujih), and invite people to goodness, truth, Islamic guidance, and save them from misguidance both aqidah and way of life, with the right method. So, from here we understand that Islamic da'wah is not only a lecture, but also by example, Islamic writings, good morals, social care, nurturing and protecting, providing solutions, and various efforts to convey guidance and love for Islam.…”

Section: ‫عن‬ ‫والنهي‬ ‫بالمعروف‬ ‫واألمر‬ ‫الشر،‬ ‫واجتناب‬ ‫الخير‬ ...mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Problems of Da'wah Ummah

Abdul Majid

2023

alrisalah

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article titled "The Problems of Dakwah Ummah" offers an in-depth exploration of the contemporary challenges faced by the Ummah (the global Muslim community) in propagating Islamic teachings and values, known as dakwah. As globalization continues to interconnect societies, new platforms and mediums for dakwah emerge, but so do an array of complications. This piece sheds light on various facets such as the influence of modern technology on dakwah, the potential distortion of religious messages, socio-political constraints, and cultural adaptations. It also underscores the necessity for a holistic understanding and a renewed methodology in dakwah to ensure its efficacy in contemporary contexts. Through a careful balance of historical analysis, and case studies, this article provides both a diagnostic view and prospective solutions for the ongoing struggles of dakwah in the Ummah

show abstract

“…Hence, ChatGPT can potentially be used in the medical field as an adjunct tool to improve work efficiency 13 , 14 , 15 ) . Further, ChatGPT can be used to provide patients with medical information 16 ) and to compose medical texts and academic articles 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ) .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of the accuracy of ChatGPT’s responses to and references for clinical questions in physical therapy

Sawamura,

Bito,

Ando

et al. 2024

J Phys Ther Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

[Purpose] This study evaluated the accuracy of ChatGPT’s responses to and references for five clinical questions in physical therapy based on the Physical Therapy Guidelines and assessed this language model’s potential as a tool for supporting clinical decision-making in the rehabilitation field. [Participants and Methods] Five clinical questions from the “Stroke”, “Musculoskeletal disorders”, and “Internal disorders” sections of the Physical Therapy Guidelines , released by the Japanese Society of Physical Therapy, were presented to ChatGPT. ChatGPT was instructed to provide responses in Japanese accompanied by references such as PubMed IDs or digital object identifiers. The accuracy of the generated content and references was evaluated by two assessors with expertise in their respective sections by using a 4-point scale, and comments were provided for point deductions. The inter-rater agreement was evaluated using weighted kappa coefficients. [Results] ChatGPT demonstrated adequate accuracy in generating content for clinical questions in physical therapy. However, the accuracy of the references was poor, with a significant number of references being non-existent or misinterpreted. [Conclusion] ChatGPT has limitations in reference selection and reliability. While ChatGPT can offer accurate responses to clinical questions in physical therapy, it should be used with caution because it is not a completely reliable model.

show abstract

Changes in Pharyngeal Airway Space and Oxygen Saturation Following Mandibular Setback Surgery: A Narrative Review

Cited by 6 publications

References 26 publications

Artificial intelligence: ChatGPT as a disruptive didactic strategy in dental education

Artificial intelligence: ChatGPT as a disruptive didactic strategy in dental education

The Problems of Da'wah Ummah

Evaluation of the accuracy of ChatGPT’s responses to and references for clinical questions in physical therapy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About