2021
DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2021.1888016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Changing neighborhoods, shifting connections: mapping relational geographies of gentrification using social media data

Abstract: The emergence of new sources of so-called 'big data' is regularly described as revolutionizing the study of urban life. Of particular interest is gentrification, which has been measured and mapped in fairly standard ways -even as its place in the broader public consciousness has grown rapidly. We argue that big data offers a new approach to the persistent problem of defining and measuring gentrification. Moreover, using big data also allows us to rethink broader questions about theory and methodological approa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used 130-km wide hexagonal cells to map tweets at the global scale (shown in Figure 5) and 65-km wide for tweets at the national (US) scale (shown in Figure 6). The number of tweets within the hexagon units for both global and national maps were normalized by calculating the odds ratio and taking the lower bound of the 99.9% confidence for each unit, which is expressed as follows where p i is the number of tweets in hexagon i related to the #migrantcaravan, p is the sum of all tweets about the #migrantcaravan; r i is the number of random tweets in hexagon i and r is the sum of all random tweets (for description and application of this normalization methods, see Shelton et al., 2014; Poorthuis et al., 2016, 2020). We used a dataset consisting of 315,029 random geotagged tweets sent globally between 2012 and 2016 to normalize the tweets in the global map (Figure 5), and 820,587 random geotagged tweets sent from North America in 2014 to normalize the tweets in the US map (Figure 6).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used 130-km wide hexagonal cells to map tweets at the global scale (shown in Figure 5) and 65-km wide for tweets at the national (US) scale (shown in Figure 6). The number of tweets within the hexagon units for both global and national maps were normalized by calculating the odds ratio and taking the lower bound of the 99.9% confidence for each unit, which is expressed as follows where p i is the number of tweets in hexagon i related to the #migrantcaravan, p is the sum of all tweets about the #migrantcaravan; r i is the number of random tweets in hexagon i and r is the sum of all random tweets (for description and application of this normalization methods, see Shelton et al., 2014; Poorthuis et al., 2016, 2020). We used a dataset consisting of 315,029 random geotagged tweets sent globally between 2012 and 2016 to normalize the tweets in the global map (Figure 5), and 820,587 random geotagged tweets sent from North America in 2014 to normalize the tweets in the US map (Figure 6).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sentiment analysis also requires specific caution when interpreting results (Plunz et al, 2019; Roberts et al, 2019) since data often reflect self‐selection biases. However, as Poorthuis et al (2022) note, such limits should not invalidate use. Rather, researchers may draw on “qualitative and experiential knowledge to contextualize and enrich what can be inferred” (Poorthuis et al, 2022, p. 978).…”
Section: Understanding Concern For Urban Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as Poorthuis et al (2022) note, such limits should not invalidate use. Rather, researchers may draw on “qualitative and experiential knowledge to contextualize and enrich what can be inferred” (Poorthuis et al, 2022, p. 978). We keep the need for such care in mind, employing an approach that works with the strengths of the emails and combines qualitative coding, statistical and sentiment testing, and spatial analysis.…”
Section: Understanding Concern For Urban Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such data have gained significant popularity as a way to investigate the spatial, social, and temporal characteristics of urban spaces (Li et al, 2019; Martí et al, 2019; Shaw and Sui, 2020). In addition, researchers have used these data to infer socio-geographical relations between people and places and use these relations to shine light on a number of urban issues such as individual activity spaces (Ayala-Azcárraga et al, 2019; Jurdak et al, 2015), social interaction (Prasetyo et al, 2016), gentrification (Poorthuis et al, 2021), and social inequality (Pendall and Hedman, 2016; Shelton et al, 2015).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%