Changing the Advising Model

Abstract

This workinprogress paper describes the work Northwestern University's School of Engineering is doing to implement change in how firstyear students are advised. Northwestern University's McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, McCormick, wanted to provide consistent advising to the incoming class, opportunities for students to feel a sense of belonging within the school, and help to students develop the skills required to become selfreliant, resilient, and successful University graduates. The McCormick Administration decided to build an advising model based on a learnercentered concept sometimes called the AdvisingasTeaching paradigm.Traditionally, FirstYear students at Northwestern University were assigned to a faculty adviser, in a department based on their stated intended major. Undeclared students were randomly assigned to a faculty member. This advising model gave incoming students a home department, but not necessarily the department undeclared students wanted. In addition, students that changed majors, or were exploring majors, often needed to find their own connections with faculty in other departments. Lastly, in addition to helping students new to the university, higher education, and Engineering, faculty were tasked with teaching, building and managing research programs, advising graduate students, publishing and making progress towards promotion and tenure.While the advisertraining gave faculty the tools to help students build a schedule, many faculty had little time to actually engage and advise undergraduate students. Many faculty were not fully engaging students . Faculty advising across McCormick departments led to uneven advising for FirstYear students.Under the new model, McCormick Advisers are tasked with academic advising and teaching. This 55/45 split in duties means the Advisers are more focused on the task of advising incoming classes. In exchange, McCormick Advisers advise each class through its first year. McCormick Advisers are also colocated in a suite. This office arrangement, along with a narrow focus, are able to collaborate on advising and mentoring students.Outcomes of the model should come in the form of increased student satisfaction with academic advising, increased awareness of and participation in academic programs such as Study Abroad, Exchange and CoOps Programs, and the Engineering School. The success of the advising change will be measured in multiple ways. Students will participate in both summative and formative assessment activities throughout the academic year. This assessment will be conducted by Student Affairs as part of the FirstYear Seminar. Additional assessment will be conducted by the Engineering School. Students will be given an opportunity to participate in an Advising Survey. In past years, sophomore and senior students were surveyed. Starting this year, all students will be given an advising survey. The University will continue its satisfaction survey as well. This paper will explore the intended and unintended consequences of changing...

Using a Lightboard to Enhance and Retrofit an Existing Course

“…This is of some particular interest, as the class is largely built around consideration of abstract concepts and systems-focused decision making and goals, which is a departure from the original uses of the Lightboard for mathematical and scientific examples [1]. This use is close to but also distinct from the procedural and administrative questions that have been presented using the tool [4].…”

Work in Progress: Analyzing Student Outcomes to Inform First-Year Advising Practices and Policies at Northwestern University's McCormick School of Engineering

“…Northwestern's McCormick School of Engineering has five full-time first-year academic advisers who are tasked with advising the incoming class as well as teaching (Freeman, 2016). These advisers work with incoming engineering students, starting the summer before they arrive, and continuing through their first year.…”

“…effective study habits and time management), help with major selection, and discuss how a student can balance his academics with personal activities and interests. Facilitating this process is the Advising System (MAS), which serves as an online degree audit and advising-tools system (Freeman, 2016). MAS contains a copy of each student's course and grade history, electronic degree forms, current degree audit, multi-year study plan, and an electronic messaging system.…”

“…This model of advising was entirely new to the School of Engineering at Northwestern, and for the first several years the team's work focused on the consistent implementation of existing advising practices and policies for every first-year student. These advising practices have existed for fifteen to twenty years, and although software for advising students had recently been developed (Freeman, 2016) to track student advising consistency, little has yet been done to determine if these practices still applied well to the current student population, particularly as it relates to students who come in meeting the minimum requirements. We describe in this work-in-progress an initial foray into an analysis of ten years of student outcomes to reveal broad trends in student performance and areas where our advising systems and practices most need revision.…”

Engineering and Technology Literacy Introduced in Cornerstone Design Courses

“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Since the School of Engineering switched to dedicated First Year Advising in 2013, all first year students are strongly advised to take DTC1 and 2 as first year courses. 15 This means that approximately 512 students took DTC1 and 2 AY2015-16 and 487 students in AY 2016-17.…”